How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login

News

Dogs are helping people regulate stress even more than expected, research shows

Studies show that dogs help humans cope with stress. marcoventuriniautieri/E+ via Getty Immages

In a 2022 survey of 3,000 U.S. adults, more than one-third of respondents reported that on most days, they feel “completely overwhelmed” by stress. At the same time, a growing body of research is documenting the negative health consequences of higher stress levels, which include increased rates of cancer, heart disease, autoimmune conditions and even dementia.

Assuming people’s daily lives are unlikely to get less stressful anytime soon, simple and effective ways to mitigate these effects are needed.

This is where dogs can help.

As researchers at the University of Denver’s Institute for Human-Animal Connection, we study the effects animal companions have on their humans.

Dozens of studies over the last 40 years have confirmed that pet dogs help humans feel more relaxed. This would explain the growing phenomenon of people relying on emotional support dogs to assist them in navigating everyday life. Dog owners have also been shown to have a 24% lower risk of death and a four times greater chance of surviving for at least a year after a heart attack.

Now, a new study that we conducted with a team of colleagues suggests that dogs might have a deeper and more biologically complex effect on humans than scientists previously believed. And this complexity may have profound implications for human health.

How stress works

The human response to stress is a finely tuned and coordinated set of various physiological pathways. Previous studies of the effects of dogs on human stress focused on just one pathway at a time. For our study, we zoomed out a bit and measured multiple biological indicators of the body’s state, or biomarkers, from both of the body’s major stress pathways. This allowed us to get a more complete picture of how a dog’s presence affects stress in the human body.

The stress pathways we measured are the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal, or HPA, axis and the sympathoadrenal medullary, or SAM, axis.

When a person experiences a stressful event, the SAM axis acts quickly, triggering a “fight or flight” response that includes a surge of adrenaline, leading to a burst of energy that helps us meet threats. This response can be measured through an enzyme called alpha-amylase.

At the same time, but a little more slowly, the HPA axis activates the adrenal glands to produce the hormone cortisol. This can help a person meet threats that might last for hours or even days. If everything goes well, when the danger ends, both axes settle down, and the body goes back to its calm state.

While stress can be an uncomfortable feeling, it has been important to human survival. Our hunter-gatherer ancestors had to respond effectively to acute stress events like an animal attack. In such instances, over-responding could be as ineffective as under-responding. Staying in an optimal stress response zone maximized humans’ chances of survival.

An man pets a dog in a gym.
Dogs can be more helpful than human friends in coping with stressful situations. FG Trade/E+ via Getty Images

More to the story

After cortisol is released by the adrenal glands, it eventually makes its way into your saliva, making it an easily accessible biomarker to track responses. Because of this, most research on dogs and stress has focused on salivary cortisol alone.

For example, several studies have found that people exposed to a stressful situation have a lower cortisol response if they’re with a dog than if they’re alone – even lower than if they’re with a friend.

While these studies have shown that having a dog nearby can lower cortisol levels during a stressful event, suggesting the person is calmer, we suspected that was just part of the story.

What our study measured

For our study, we recruited about 40 dog owners to participate in a 15-minute gold standard laboratory stress test. This involves public speaking and oral math in front of a panel of expressionless people posing as behavioral specialists.

The participants were randomly assigned to bring their dogs to the lab with them or to leave their dogs at home. We measured cortisol in blood samples taken before, immediately after and about 45 minutes following the test as a biomarker of HPA axis activity. And unlike previous studies, we also measured the enzyme alpha-amylase in the same blood samples as a biomarker of the SAM axis.

As expected based on previous studies, the people who had their dog with them showed lower cortisol spikes. But we also found that people with their dog experienced a clear spike of alpha-amylase, while those without their dog showed almost no response.

No response may sound like a good thing, but in fact, a flat alpha-amylase response can be a sign of a dysregulated response to stress, often seen in people experiencing high stress responses, chronic stress or even PTSD. This lack of response is caused by chronic or overwhelming stress that can change how our nervous system responds to stressors.

In contrast, the participants with their dogs had a more balanced response: Their cortisol didn’t spike too high, but their alpha-amylase still activated. This shows that they were alert and engaged throughout the test, then able to return to normal within 45 minutes. That’s the sweet spot for handling stress effectively. Our research suggests that our canine companions keep us in a healthy zone of stress response.

Having a dog benefits humans’ physical and psychological health.

Dogs and human health

This more nuanced understanding of the biological effects of dogs on the human stress response opens up exciting possibilities. Based on the results of our study, our team has begun a new study using thousands of biomarkers to delve deeper into the biology of how psychiatric service dogs reduce PTSD in military veterans.

But one thing is already clear: Dogs aren’t just good company. They might just be one of the most accessible and effective tools for staying healthy in a stressful world.The Conversation

Kevin Morris, Research Professor of Social Work, University of Denver and Jaci Gandenberger, Research Associate of Social Work, University of Denver

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Middletown man identified as fatality in Sunday crash; driver arrested

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The California Highway Patrol said Tuesday that a south county wreck on Sunday evening claimed the life of a Middletown man, with the driver arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence and vehicular manslaughter.

The CHP’s Clear Lake Area office identified Samrat Kakkari, 45, as the person who died in the solo-vehicle crash.

The driver, Steven Craig Wilhite Jr., 44, of Calistoga, was arrested after the crash, authorities said.

The Tuesday report said that at approximately 6:58 p.m. Sunday, CHP Clear Lake personnel received a call of a traffic crash involving a solo vehicle rollover on Big Canyon Road, north of Harbin Springs Road, near Middletown.

When the officers arrived, they determined that the vehicle, a pickup, overturned several times, ejecting a passenger and causing fatal injuries, the CHP said.

Radio reports on Sunday night indicated that Kakkari was trapped under the bed of the pickup, which was on its side, blocking Big Canyon Road, as Lake County News has reported.

The Lake County Sheriff’s Office and South Lake County Fire also responded to the scene to assist with medical aid, the CHP said.

The CHP said the preliminary investigation determined that Wilhite was driving his Dodge Ram pickup while under the influence of a controlled substance while Kakkari was riding in the front right passenger seat of Wilhite’s truck.

Wilhite, the report said, “was driving at unsafe speeds on a dirt/gravel roadway causing him to lose control of his vehicle, which overturned and ejected Kakkari.”

The CHP said South Lake County firefighters worked to save his life but Kakkari died of his injuries at the scene.

Neither Wilhite nor Kakkari were wearing their seatbelts at the time of the crash, the CHP said.

Wilhite was arrested and treated for his injuries before being booked at the Lake County Jail for vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and felony DUI, the CHP reported.

Lake County Jail records showed that Wilhite remained in custody on Tuesday afternoon, with bail set at $1,030,000.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social. 

Lake County Planning Commission to consider new environmental impact report for Guenoc Valley resort

LAKEPORT, Calif. — This week the Guenoc Valley Mixed Use Planned Development Project will make its return to the Lake County Planning Commission, which will consider whether or not to approve the project’s new environmental documents and recommend possible zoning changes to the Board of Supervisors.

The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. Thursday, July 24, in the board chambers on the first floor of the Lake County Courthouse, 255 N. Forbes St., Lakeport.

The agenda is here.

To participate in real-time, join the Zoom meeting by clicking this link. 

The webinar ID is 994 1760 2765, the pass code is 155982. 

Access the meeting via one tap mobile at +16699006833,,99417602765#,,,,*155982# or dial in at 669-900-6833 or 1-669-444-9171.

The meeting also can be viewed on the county’s website or Facebook page.

The Planning Commission’s main item of business at the Thursday meeting is a public hearing to consider certifying a new final environmental impact report, or EIR, for the project, as well as make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors about changes to the Lake County General Plan, the Middletown Area Plan and the Lake County Zoning Ordinance.

The project will be built on a portion of what’s known in the planning documents as the “Guenoc Valley Site,” which consists of 82 existing parcels covering approximately 16,000 acres located in southeastern Lake County near Middletown.

The property has been owned since 2016 by Chinese developer Yiming Xu and his firm, Lotusland Investment Holdings of San Francisco. Lotusland also is the project’s applicant.

While Lotusland’s holdings also include Langtry Farms — once owned by famed English actress Lillie Langtry — county planning documents state that the Guenoc Valley Site does not include the approximately 360 acres which contains the Langtry winery and the Lillie Langtry estate home.

The project’s first EIR was certified in 2020. In June of that year, the Lake County Planning Commission voted to approve forwarding the ultra-luxury resort plan to the Board of Supervisors, which approved it the following month.

In the form approved by the board, the project, which also has been known as Maha Guenoc Valley, included a first phase covering a 1,415-acre footprint that was slated to include 385 residential villas in five subdivisions; five boutique hotels with 127 hotel units and 141 resort residential cottages; 20 campsites; up to 100 workforce housing co-housing units; resort amenities such as an outdoor entertainment area, spa and wellness amenities, sports fields, equestrian areas, a new golf course and practice facility, camping area and commercial and retail facilities; agricultural production and support facilities; essential accessory facilities, including back of house facilities; 50 temporary workforce hotel units; emergency response and fire center, float plane dock, helipads; and supporting infrastructure, according to planning documents.

In September 2020, the Center for Biological Diversity and the California Native Plant Society sued the county over the project, with the California Attorney General’s Office intervening in support of their suit.

That led to a 2021 trial in Lake County Superior Court before Judge J. David Markham who, in a January 2022 decision, found that the county’s EIR on the project was insufficient due to its conclusions that community fire evacuation routes were “less than significant.”

Markham ordered the county to rescind the project approvals because the EIR omitted disclosure and analysis of the project’s impacts on wildfire evacuation and public safety.

While Markham’s ruling resulted in a new EIR needing to be created, late last year, the California First District Appellate Court also ruled in the matter, taking action to additionally order a new EIR. Its ruling went further than Markham’s because the appellate court determined that the county failed to assess how the project would worsen existing wildfire risks.

Staff’s report to the Planning Commission explains that, at full buildout, throughout multiple phases, the resort project would allow for the development of up to 400 hotel rooms, 450 resort residential units, 1,400 residential estates, and 500 workforce co-housing units within the zoning district. 

The project’s phase one includes the phased subdivision to allow up to 385 residential villas, 141 resort residential units, 147 hotel units, accessory resort and commercial uses; a subdivision and rezoning of an off-site parcel to accommodate 21 single family residences with optional accessory dwelling units, 29 duplex units in 15 structures, and a community clubhouse and associated infrastructure; a proposed water supply well on an off-site parcel and pipeline located adjacent to and within Butts Canyon Road, along with intersection and electrical transmission line improvements.

Project modifications, as outlined in the staff report, include the following:

• Relocating 25 residential building sites that the 2020 project would have located on a hilltop near the proposed Equestrian Center and 39 residential building sites that the 2020 project would have located within the northeastern portion of the project site to move them further from the wildland/urban interface.
• A new proposed emergency route called the Grange Road Connector will connect the Guenoc Valley Site with the county-maintained Grange Road to the north. 
• Reconfiguring the roadway plan so that there are no dead-end, non-looped road segments that exceed one mile in length.
• Improving an area of approximately 10 feet on each side of roadways with hardscape, to the extent topography permits.
• Removal of the camping area in the northern portion of the property.
• Funding and staffing commitments for the onsite emergency response center.
• Various renewable energy commitments and greenhouse gas reduction measures that will not change the development footprint.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social. 

NCO Community Emergency Response Team and Lake County Public Health launch mutual aid partnership

North Coast Opportunities’ Community Emergency Response Team, or CERT, Dennis Burke and Amanda Samson stand in front of the CERT Equipment Trailer. Photo courtesy of North Coast Opportunities.


LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — North Coast Opportunities’ Community Emergency Response Team, or CERT, in Lake County has entered into a formal mutual aid memorandum of understanding with the Lake County Public Health Department, effective July 1.

This new collaboration creates a reciprocal partnership: NCO CERT Instructors will provide disaster preparedness and emergency response training to Lake County Public Health Public Health staff, while Public Health will offer training to CERT volunteers to support vaccine clinics and public health emergency response, including future pandemics.

The partnership is already in action — NCO CERT Instructors Dennis Burke (Project Coordinator III) and Lead Volunteer Duell Parks recently conducted training for Public Health staff on fire suppression and fire extinguisher use. 

Public Health-led training for CERT volunteers is set to begin soon and will include topics such as handling toxic and hazardous materials during emergencies.

Lake County Public Health is also investing $15,000 to support several CERT programs. This funding will expand outreach through:

• Preparedness Program Awareness for Seniors, or PPAS, offering disaster readiness resources, go-bags and smoke detectors to vulnerable seniors;
• A brand-new TEEN CERT Program launching in a local high school — Lake and Mendocino Counties’ first;
• Continued disaster pet preparedness outreach;
• Completion of ham radio installations in Lake County CERT disaster trailers, including solar power systems.

NCO said this milestone was made possible through the dedication of Public Health staff and NCO’s Dennis Burke, Amanda Samson (Project Coordinator I) and Program Manager Yvett Reeve, who championed the project through months of planning and coordination.

“This partnership strengthens our ability to serve Lake County through coordinated response and proactive preparedness,” said Reeve.

North Coast Opportunities Inc. is a nonprofit community action agency serving Lake and Mendocino counties, with additional programs in Humboldt, Sonoma, Del Norte, Napa and Solano counties.

PBS and NPR are generally unbiased, independent of government propaganda and provide key benefits to US democracy

Congress’ cuts to public broadcasting will diminish the range and volume of the free press and the independent reporting it provides. MicroStockHub-iStock/Getty Images Plus

Champions of the almost entirely party-line vote in the U.S. Senate to erase US$1.1 billion in already approved funds for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting called their action a refusal to subsidize liberal media.

“Public broadcasting has long been overtaken by partisan activists,” said U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, insisting there is no need for government to fund what he regards as biased media. “If you want to watch the left-wing propaganda, turn on MSNBC,” Cruz said.

Accusing the media of liberal bias has been a consistent conservative complaint since the civil rights era, when white Southerners insisted news outlets were slanting their stories against segregation. During his presidential campaign in 1964, U.S. Sen. Barry Goldwater of Arizona complained that the media was against him, an accusation that has been repeated by every Republican presidential candidate since.

But those charges of bias rarely survive empirical scrutiny.

As chair of a public policy institute devoted to strengthening deliberative democracy, I have written two books about the media and the presidency, and another about media ethics. My research traces how news institutions shape civic life and why healthy democracies rely on journalism that is independent of both market pressure and partisan talking points.

That independence in the United States – enshrined in the press freedom clause of the First Amendment – gives journalists the ability to hold government accountable, expose abuses of power and thereby support democracy.

A gray-haired man with a beard and wearing a blue jacket and tie, talks in a large room.
GOP Sen. Ted Cruz speaks to reporters as Senate Republicans vote on President Donald Trump’s request to cancel about $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting spending on July 16, 2025. AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Trusting independence

Ad Fontes Media, a self-described “public benefit company” whose mission is to rate media for credibility and bias, have placed the reporting of “PBS NewsHour” under 10 points left of the ideological center. They label it as both “reliable” and based in “analysis/fact.” “Fox and Friends,” by contrast, the popular morning show on Fox News, is nearly 20 points to the right. The scale starts at zero and runs 42 points to the left to measure progressive bias and 42 points to the right to measure conservative bias. Ratings are provided by three-person panels comprising left-, right- and center-leaning reviewers.

A 2020 peer-reviewed study in Science Advances that tracked more than 6,000 political reporters likewise found “no evidence of liberal media bias” in the stories they chose to cover, even though most journalists are more left-leaning than the rest of the population.

A similar 2016 study published in Public Opinion Quarterly said that media are more similar than dissimilar and, excepting political scandals, “major news organizations present topics in a largely nonpartisan manner, casting neither Democrats nor Republicans in a particularly favorable or unfavorable light.”

Surveys show public media’s audiences do not see it as biased. A national poll of likely voters released July 14, 2025, found that 53% of respondents trust public media to report news “fully, accurately and fairly,” while only 35% extend that trust to “the media in general.” A majority also opposed eliminating federal support.

Contrast these numbers with attitudes about public broadcasters such as MTVA in Hungary or the TVP in Poland, where the state controls most content. Protests in Budapest October 2024 drew thousands demanding an end to “propaganda.” Oxford’s Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism reports that TVP is the least trusted news outlet in the country.

While critics sometimes conflate American public broadcasting with state-run outlets, the structures are very different.

Safeguards for editorial freedom

In state-run media systems, a government agency hires editors, dictates coverage and provides full funding from the treasury. Public officials determine – or make up – what is newsworthy. Individual media operations survive only so long as the party in power is happy.

Public broadcasting in the U.S. works in almost exactly the opposite way: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is a private nonprofit with a statutory “firewall” that forbids political interference.

More than 70% of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s federal appropriation for 2025 of US$1.1 billion flows through to roughly 1,500 independently governed local stations, most of which are NPR or PBS affiliates but some of which are unaffiliated community broadcasters. CPB headquarters retains only about 5% of that federal funding.

Stations survive by combining this modest federal grant money with listener donations, underwriting and foundation support. That creates a diversified revenue mix that further safeguards their editorial freedom.

And while stations share content, each also has latitude when it comes to programming and news coverage, especially at the local level.

As a public-private partnership, individual communities mostly own the public broadcasting system and its affiliate stations. Congress allocates funds, while community nonprofits, university boards, state authorities or other local license holders actually own and run the stations. Individual monthly donors are often called “members” and sometimes have voting rights in station-governance matters. Membership contributions make up the largest share of revenue for most stations, providing another safeguard for editorial independence.

Two people inside a radio studio, sitting at a long table-desk combination.
A host and guest in July 2024 sit inside a recording studio at KMXT, the public radio station on Kodiak Island in Alaska. Nathaniel Herz/Northern Journal

Broadly shared civic commons

And then there are public media’s critical benefits to democracy itself.

A 2021 report from the European Broadcasting Union links public broadcasting with higher voter turnout, better factual knowledge and lower susceptibility to extremist rhetoric.

Experts warn that even small cuts will exacerbate an already pernicious problem with political disinformation in the U.S., as citizens lose access to free information that fosters media literacy and encourages trust across demographics.

In many ways, public media remains the last broadly shared civic commons. It is both commercial-free and independently edited.

Another study, by the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School in 2022, affirmed that “countries with independent and well-funded public broadcasting systems also consistently have stronger democracies.”

The study highlighted how public media works to bridge divides and foster understanding across polarized groups. Unlike commercial media, where the profit motive often creates incentives to emphasize conflict and sensationalism, public media generally seeks to provide balanced perspectives that encourage dialogue and mutual respect. Reports are often longer and more in-depth than those by other news outlets.

Such attention to nuance provides a critical counterweight to the fragmented, often hyperpartisan news bubbles that pervade cable news and social media. And this skillful, more balanced treatment helps to ameliorate political polarization and misinformation.

In all, public media’s unique structure and mission make democracy healthier in the U.S. and across the world. Public media prioritizes education and civic enlightenment. It gives citizens important tools for navigating complex issues to make informed decisions – whether those decisions are about whom to vote for or about public policy itself. Maintaining and strengthening public broadcasting preserves media diversity and advances important principles of self-government.

Congress’ cuts to public broadcasting will diminish the range and volume of the free press and the independent reporting it provides. Ronald Reagan once described a free press as vital for the United States to succeed in its “noble experiment in self-government.” From that perspective, more independent reporting – not less – will prove the best remedy for any worry about partisan spin.The Conversation

Stephanie A. (Sam) Martin, Frank and Bethine Church Endowed Chair of Public Affairs, Boise State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Legislators oppose Trump administration’s attempt to undermine church-state separation

Last week, Congressional Freethought Caucus Co-Chairs Jared Huffman (CA-02) and Jamie Raskin (MD-08) led their colleagues in a letter to Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Billy Long expressing concerns regarding the Trump administration’s recent court filing that undermines the constitutional separation of church and state.

The filing signals that Trump can allow churches to endorse or oppose political candidates from the pulpit — blatantly violating the 70-year-old Johnson Amendment while still maintaining their tax-exempt status. 

The legislators contend that the motion is a strikingly inaccurate reinterpretation of current U.S. laws that help reconcile and harmonize our nation’s core principles of free speech, free exercise of religion, and the separation between church and state.

In their letter to Commissioner Long, the lawmakers demand that the IRS immediately reconsider its motion and remedy its failure to enforce the Johnson Amendment in accordance with longstanding legal interpretations and statutory requirements.

“As members of the Congressional Freethought Caucus, we urge you to reconsider the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) decision to propose the deeply flawed proposed settlement in the matter of National Religious Broadcasters Association et al v. Long. We strongly disagree with the stunningly inaccurate reinterpretation of the Johnson Amendment adopted in this proposed settlement,” the lawmakers wrote. “Congress passed the Johnson Amendment 70 years ago to reconcile and harmonize our nation’s core principles of free speech, free exercise of religion and the separation between church and state. This proposed settlement now threatens to upend and unravel that careful and delicate balance.”

The lawmakers continued, “When writing the tax code in 1954 to establish guardrails around organizational tax exemption, Congress included the Johnson Amendment without any extended discussion or debate. It was noncontroversial and widely supported precisely because it established reasonable boundaries between partisan politics and tax-exempt religious exercise. Under the Johnson Amendment, houses of worship are protected from government interference by securing tax exemptions while taxpayers are protected from being compelled to subsidize religious institutions’ political speech.”

“It is therefore deeply troubling that the IRS, in supporting the flawed arguments made by the plaintiffs in this case, accepts the false opposition that the religious Right has tried to create between the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses,” the lawmakers added.

In addition to Reps. Huffman and Raskin, the letter was signed by Reps. Yassamin Ansari, Becca Balint, Suzanne Bonamici, Julia Brownley, Greg Casar, Sean Casten, Lizzie Fletcher, Laura Friedman, Robert Garcia, Pramila Jayapal, Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Mark Pocan, Delia C. Ramirez, Emily Randall, Andrea Salinas, Rashida Tlaib, and Nydia Velázquez.

The Congressional Freethought Caucus is an interfaith group of members dedicated to advocating for religious freedom, church-state separation, and public policies based on science and reason.

Read the full letter below.

Mr. Billy Long
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20222

Honorable Commissioner Long:

As members of the Congressional Freethought Caucus, we urge you to reconsider the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) decision to propose the deeply flawed proposed settlement in the matter of National Religious Broadcasters Association et al v. Long. We strongly disagree with the stunningly inaccurate reinterpretation of the Johnson Amendment adopted in this proposed settlement. Congress passed the Johnson Amendment 70 years ago to reconcile and harmonize our nation’s core principles of free speech, free exercise of religion and the separation between church and state. This proposed settlement now threatens to upend and unravel that careful and delicate balance.

When writing the tax code in 1954 to establish guardrails around organizational tax exemption, Congress included the Johnson Amendment without any extended discussion or debate. It was noncontroversial and widely supported precisely because it established reasonable boundaries between partisan politics and tax-exempt religious exercise. Under the Johnson Amendment, houses of worship are protected from government interference by securing tax exemptions while taxpayers are protected from being compelled to subsidize religious institutions’ political speech. It is therefore deeply troubling that the IRS, in supporting the flawed arguments made by the plaintiffs in this case, accepts the false opposition that the religious Right has tried to create between the First Amendment’s Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses.

The Religious Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses are equally essential and they stand best when they stand together. The American Founders were rebelling against centuries of established churches, religious warfare, Crusades, inquisitions, witch trials, and other manifestations of religious authoritarianism. They sought to break from theocratic rule and the imposition of religious orthodoxy on free citizens. The Constitution’s Framers brilliantly perceived that the greatest threat to religious freedom and freedom of conscience was theocracy and one religious group deploying state power to persecute and oppress others.

The core argument of the IRS’s Joint Motion for a Consent Agreement (Joint Motion) is that discussions conducted by houses of worship with their congregations about electoral campaign politics constitute nothing more than “a family discussion concerning candidates.” According to the Joint Motion, faith leaders endorsing political candidates from their tax-exempt pulpit are engaging in a “family discussion” because this discussion doesn’t “participate” nor “intervene” in a political campaign. The evidence that the IRS offers in support of this baffling claim are two definitions from Merriam Webster’s 2025 edition. Casting aside over 70 years of
legal precedent thus turns on nothing more than the magic trick of picking a preferred dictionary and ascribing choice definitions to a few well-chosen verbs.

The Joint Motion further contends that the Johnson Amendment is unenforceable in this case because, under the IRS’s own admission, the agency has not enforced the statute prior to the complaint. This argument is extraordinary. The IRS, as part of the Executive Branch, is bound by Article II to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. In this case, the IRS must enforce the Johnson Amendment as passed by Congress until Congress votes to amend or nullify the statute. This amazing argument asks the courts to give the plaintiffs in this case a free pass to violate the Johnson Amendment because no one has dared to violate it before or because the IRS had other enforcement priorities. This argument blows the door wide open for other religious organizations — or for that matter, secular nonprofits — to petition the courts for their own free pass to engage in tax-exempt partisan political speech.

Congress passed the Johnson Amendment to protect religious institutions from government interference and the taxpayers from having to subsidize partisan political speech by religious actors. Houses of worship are not subject to the same transparency and accountability requirements as other 501(c)(3) organizations. Houses of worship are granted automatic tax exempt status, and unlike other 501(c)(3)s do not have to apply for tax-exempt status (file Form 1023) or file annual returns (Form 990 series). These institutions are also rarely audited. Allowing houses of worship to wade into politics not only erodes the separation of church and
state but also opens the door to other even more sweeping potential abuses of their tax-exempt status. Without meaningful transparency or regulatory oversight, churches could become conduits for undisclosed political spending, influence campaigns, and partisan slate Endorsements — all while enjoying the benefits of taxpayer subsidies.

The IRS cannot unilaterally reinterpret the Johnson Amendment and cast aside 70 years of settled law. We urge the IRS to reconsider its Joint Motion without further delay. We also request a written response within 30 days addressing the following:

1. Explain the decision-making process behind the IRS’s departure from its longstanding enforcement of a binding federal statute. What novel legal and factual interpretations undergird this decision?

2. Please describe any actions the IRS has taken or plans to take to remedy its failure to enforce the Johnson Amendment in accordance with longstanding legal interpretations and statutory requirements.

We appreciate your attention to this matter.

  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153

Community

  • Lake County Wine Alliance offers sponsor update; beneficiary applications open 

  • Mendocino National Forest announces seasonal hiring for upcoming field season

Public Safety

  • Lakeport Police logs: Thursday, Jan. 15

  • Lakeport Police logs: Wednesday, Jan. 14

Education

  • Woodland Community College receives maximum eight-year reaffirmation of accreditation from ACCJC

  • SNHU announces Fall 2025 President's List

Health

  • California ranks 24th in America’s Health Rankings Annual Report from United Health Foundation

  • Healthy blood donors especially vital during active flu season

Business

  • Two Lake County Mediacom employees earn company’s top service awards

  • Redwood Credit Union launches holiday gift and porch-to-pantry food drives

Obituaries

  • Rufino ‘Ray’ Pato

  • Patty Lee Smith

Opinion & Letters

  • The benefits of music for students

  • How to ease the burden of high electric bills

Veterans

  • CalVet and CSU Long Beach team up to improve data collection related to veteran suicides

  • A ‘Big Step Forward’ for Gulf War Veterans

Recreation

  • Wet weather trail closure in effect on Upper Lake Ranger District

  • Mendocino National Forest seeking public input on OHV grant applications

  • State Parks announces 2026 Anderson Marsh nature walk schedule 

  • BLM lifts seasonal fire restrictions in central California

Religion

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian to host Ash Wednesday service and Lenten dinner Feb. 18

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian Church to hold ‘Longest Night’ service Dec. 21

Arts & Life

  • Auditions announced for original musical ‘Even In Shadow’ set for March 21 and 28

  • ‘The Rip’ action heist; ‘Steal’ grounded in a crime thriller

Government & Politics

  • Lake County Democrats issue endorsements in local races for the June California Primary

  • County negotiates money-saving power purchase agreement

Legals

  • March 3 hearing on ordinance amending code for commercial cannabis uses

  • Feb. 12 public hearing on resolution to establish standards for agricultural roads

How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page