How to resolve AdBlock issue? 
Legals
- Details
- Written by: Lake County Community Development Department
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Planning Commission of the County of Lake, State of California, will hold a public hearing on Major Use Permit application UP 10-06, proposing to allow a multi-phase church, retreat center and up to twelve (12) outdoor special events with a maximum of six (6) outdoor amplified special events per calendar year.
The project applicant is Jesus Christ Fellowship.
The Planning Commission will consider adoption of a mitigated negative declaration for this project based on Initial Study IS 10-28.
The project is located at 19650 State Highway 175, Middletown, CA, and further described as APN 013-011-60.
The proposed mitigated negative declaration will be available for review at the Community Development Department, Lake County Courthouse, 255 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, California, thirty (30) days before the hearing, and the staff report will be available ten (10) days before the hearing.
The review period during which the Community Development Department will receive comments on the proposed mitigated negative declaration will start on August 23, 2013 and end at the hearing on September 26, 2013.
The Planner processing this application is Michalyn DelValle, 707-263- 2221 or
The public hearing will be held in the Board of Supervisors’ Chamber in the Courthouse on September 26, 2013 at 9:05 AM, at which time and place interested persons may attend and be heard.
If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission on any of the above stated items in court, it may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Lake County Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Richard Coel, Director
By:
Danae Bowen, Office Assistant III
- Details
- Written by: Editor
SAN FRANCISCO – The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions invites public comment on a draft advisory opinion dealing with judicial ex parte communications in family law cases.
The draft opinion provides guidance on a local rule that authorizes a judge to review a request for (non-domestic violence) emergency orders in a family law matter in order to determine whether the moving papers show the necessity for an emergency hearing.
The local rule permits the review to occur without notice to the other party and without a showing that good cause exists not to give notice.
The draft opinion concludes that the local rule facilitates and permits ex parte communications, which violates the standards for ethical conduct in the California Code of Judicial Ethics.
The draft opinion and invitation to comment are posted on the committee’s Web site at http://www.JudicialEthicsOpinions.ca.gov/itc .
The deadline for comment is Sept. 9, 2013.
After considering the public’s comments on the draft opinion, the committee will decide whether or not to publish an opinion in final form. Comments are due by Sept. 9, 2013, and may be submitted in any of the following ways:
- Online at http://www.JudicialEthicsOpinions.ca.gov/itc ;
- By email to
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ; or - By mailing comments to Ms. Nancy Black, Committee Counsel, The California Supreme Court Committee on Judicial Ethics Opinions, 350 McAllister Street, San Francisco, California 94102.
CJEO is an independent committee appointed by the Supreme Court to help inform the judiciary and the public concerning judicial ethics topics.
CJEO was established as part of the court’s constitutional responsibility to guide the conduct of judges and judicial candidates (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (m)).
In making appointments to serve on CJEO, the court selects members of the bench with a strong background in judicial ethics and diverse courtroom experience.
The current 12 CJEO members are justices, judges, a commissioner, and a retired bench officer who have served in courts of various sizes throughout the state.
CJEO publishes formal opinions, issues confidential informal opinions, and provides oral advice on proper judicial conduct pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics and other authorities (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 9.80(e)(1)). CJEO acts independently of the Supreme Court, the Commission on Judicial Performance, the Judicial Council, the Administrative Office of the Courts, and all other entities (rule 9.80(b)).
For more information about CJEO, visit the CJEO Web site and view the members’ page, call toll-free at 1-855-854-5366, or email
- Details
- Written by: Lake County Board of Supervisors
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF LAKE
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 2991
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors, County of Lake, State of California, adopted Ordinance No. 2991, adding Article Seven to Chapter Seven of the Lake County Code to provide support for Public, Educational and Governmental (PEG) Cable television access facilities.
This ordinance will provide for a one-percent (1%) fee on the cable operator’s gross revenues, to be collected within the unincorporated areas of the County. The ordinance has a conditional effective date, pending a determination by the Attorney General that the PEG fee is not a tax subject to Proposition 26. A certified copy of the adopted ordinance is available in the Office of the Clerk of the Board, 255 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, CA 95453.
This ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, August 13, 2013, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rushing, Farrington and Smith
NOES: Supervisors Comstock and Brown
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
MATT PERRY
Clerk of the Board
By: Mireya G. Turner
Assistant Clerk to the Board