How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login

News

AI literacy: What it is, what it isn’t, who needs it and why it’s hard to define

AI literacy is a lot more than simply knowing how to prompt an AI chatbot. DNY59/E+ via Getty Images

It is “the policy of the United States to promote AI literacy and proficiency among Americans,” reads an executive order President Donald Trump issued on April 23, 2025. The executive order, titled Advancing Artificial Intelligence Education for American Youth, signals that advancing AI literacy is now an official national priority.

This raises a series of important questions: What exactly is AI literacy, who needs it, and how do you go about building it thoughtfully and responsibly?

The implications of AI literacy, or lack thereof, are far-reaching. They extend beyond national ambitions to remain “a global leader in this technological revolution” or even prepare an “AI-skilled workforce,” as the executive order states. Without basic literacy, citizens and consumers are not well equipped to understand the algorithmic platforms and decisions that affect so many domains of their lives: government services, privacy, lending, health care, news recommendations and more. And the lack of AI literacy risks ceding important aspects of society’s future to a handful of multinational companies.

How, then, can institutions help people understand and use – or resist – AI as individuals, workers, parents, innovators, job seekers, students, employers and citizens? We are a policy scientist and two educational researchers who study AI literacy, and we explore these issues in our research.

What AI literacy is and isn’t

At its foundation, AI literacy includes a mix of knowledge, skills and attitudes that are technical, social and ethical in nature. According to one prominent definition, AI literacy refers to “a set of competencies that enables individuals to critically evaluate AI technologies; communicate and collaborate effectively with AI; and use AI as a tool online, at home, and in the workplace.”

AI literacy is not simply programming or the mechanics of neural networks, and it is certainly not just prompt engineering – that is, the act of carefully writing prompts for chatbots. Vibe coding, or using AI to write software code, might be fun and important, but restricting the definition of literacy to the newest trend or the latest need of employers won’t cover the bases in the long term. And while a single master definition may not be needed, or even desirable, too much variation makes it tricky to decide on organizational, educational or policy strategies.

Who needs AI literacy? Everyone, including the employees and students using it, and the citizens grappling with its growing impacts. Every sector and sphere of society is now involved with AI, even if this isn’t always easy for people to see.

Exactly how much literacy everyone needs and how to get there is a much tougher question. Are a few quick HR training sessions enough, or do we need to embed AI across K-12 curricula and deliver university micro credentials and hands-on workshops? There is much that researchers don’t know, which leads to the need to measure AI literacy and the effectiveness of different training approaches.

Ethics is an important aspect of AI literacy.

Measuring AI literacy

While there is a growing and bipartisan consensus that AI literacy matters, there’s much less consensus on how to actually understand people’s AI literacy levels. Researchers have focused on different aspects, such as technical or ethical skills, or on different populations – for example, business managers and students – or even on subdomains like generative AI.

A recent review study identified more than a dozen questionnaires designed to measure AI literacy, the vast majority of which rely on self-reported responses to questions and statements such as “I feel confident about using AI.” There’s also a lack of testing to see whether these questionnaires work well for people from different cultural backgrounds.

Moreover, the rise of generative AI has exposed gaps and challenges: Is it possible to create a stable way to measure AI literacy when AI is itself so dynamic?

In our research collaboration, we’ve tried to help address some of these problems. In particular, we’ve focused on creating objective knowledge assessments, such as multiple-choice surveys tested with thorough statistical analyses to ensure that they accurately measure AI literacy. We’ve so far tested a multiple-choice survey in the U.S., U.K. and Germany and found that it works consistently and fairly across these three countries.

There’s a lot more work to do to create reliable and feasible testing approaches. But going forward, just asking people to self-report their AI literacy probably isn’t enough to understand where different groups of people are and what supports they need.

Approaches to building AI literacy

Governments, universities and industry are trying to advance AI literacy.

Finland launched the Elements of AI series in 2018 with the hope of educating its general public on AI. Estonia’s AI Leap initiative partners with Anthropic and OpenAI to provide access to AI tools for tens of thousands of students and thousands of teachers. And China is now requiring at least eight hours of AI education annually as early as elementary school, which goes a step beyond the new U.S. executive order. On the university level, Purdue University and the University of Pennsylvania have launched new master’s in AI programs, targeting future AI leaders.

Despite these efforts, these initiatives face an unclear and evolving understanding of AI literacy. They also face challenges to measuring effectiveness and minimal knowledge on what teaching approaches actually work. And there are long-standing issues with respect to equity − for example, reaching schools, communities, segments of the population and businesses that are stretched or under-resourced.

Next moves on AI literacy

Based on our research, experience as educators and collaboration with policymakers and technology companies, we think a few steps might be prudent.

Building AI literacy starts with recognizing it’s not just about tech: People also need to grasp the social and ethical sides of the technology. To see whether we’re getting there, we researchers and educators should use clear, reliable tests that track progress for different age groups and communities. Universities and companies can try out new teaching ideas first, then share what works through an independent hub. Educators, meanwhile, need proper training and resources, not just additional curricula, to bring AI into the classroom. And because opportunity isn’t spread evenly, partnerships that reach under-resourced schools and neighborhoods are essential so everyone can benefit.

Critically, achieving widespread AI literacy may be even harder than building digital and media literacy, so getting there will require serious investment – not cuts – to education and research.

There is widespread consensus that AI literacy is important, whether to boost AI trust and adoption or to empower citizens to challenge AI or shape its future. As with AI itself, we believe it’s important to approach AI literacy carefully, avoiding hype or an overly technical focus. The right approach can prepare students to become “active and responsible participants in the workforce of the future” and empower Americans to “thrive in an increasingly digital society,” as the AI literacy executive order calls for.

The Conversation will be hosting a free webinar on practical and safe use of AI with our tech editor and an AI expert on June 24 at 2pm ET/11am PT. Sign up to get your questions answered.The Conversation

Daniel S. Schiff, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Purdue University; Arne Bewersdorff, Post Doctoral Researcher in Educational Sciences, Technical University of Munich, and Marie Hornberger, Research Associate at the School of Social Sciences and Technology, Technical University of Munich

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Sutter Lakeside frontline care workers picket for better working conditions and care

SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West members, now in negotiations with Sutter Health for a new contract, picketed at Sutter Lakeside Hospital in Lakeport, California, on Tuesday, August 12, 2025, to bring attention to concerns including staffing levels and and patient safety. Photo by Elizabeth Larson/Lake County News.

LAKEPORT, Calif. — Frontline care workers from Sutter Lakeside and other Sutter Health hospitals gathered on Tuesday to hold a picket to advocate for better working conditions for staff and increased service for patients, with hospital leadership responding with assurances of their commitments to patient care and staff.

The picket took place from 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. Tuesday in the Sutter Lakeside Hospital complex, on property owned by Quest Diagnostics.

Staff with SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West held signs and waved at honking visitors in the middle of the Tuesday heat.

They also chanted. 

“What do we want?” 

“One contract!”

“When do we want it?”

“Now!”

Sutter Lakeside, hailed as “tiny but mighty” by its staff, is facing key issues such as staffing cuts and what they emphasized are unsafe staffing levels, cutting of services and corporate greed, with six chief executive officers in the Sutter system making over $1 million each.

Staff also are concerned about what’s ahead for the hospital in light of deep federal cuts to Medicaid passed by Congress earlier this year. They said that they are not receiving a clear picture of the hospital’s future and communications with hospital leadership are very poor.

Victoria Halvorsen has worked at Sutter Lakeside for nine years. She previously worked in the emergency room and now serves as the physical therapy department coordinator.

“We need help here,” said Halvorsen, adding that the hospital’s front line workers make the money to pay those CEOs.

Halvorsen worries that the cuts to Medicaid — which in California is known as Medi-Cal — will have a heavy impact on Sutter Lakeside, which is one of the only hospitals to accept that funding for physical therapy. 

“It is going to hit these hospitals,” she said.

Halvorsen and Andy Hurt, who works in the emergency room at Sutter Santa Rosa, Sutter Lakeside’s sister hospital, raised issues of unsafe staffing.

Andy Hurt, who works in the emergency department at Sutter Santa Rosa, made the trip over to Sutter Lakeside Hospital in Lakeport, California, on Tuesday, August 12, 2025, to take part in a rolling picket across Sutter facilities. Photo by Elizabeth Larson/Lake County News.

Hurt said Sutter Lakeside is the first contact for the northern part of the Sutter Health hospital system. It stabilizes patients before moving them to the next hospital. “We are so thankful for Lakeside.”

“We want the best care for our communities and our patients,” said Halvorsen, adding that their patients are their family.

Hurt said sometimes they take care of their patients their entire lives.

Halvorsen, who has seen the hospital so busy that patients were lined up in the hallways, pointed to particular concerns in her department. She said respiratory therapists have to stay with patients and can't leave them, and that there have been instances where there has only been one therapist for multiple patients, causing them to have to make decisions about who to care for. 

“How do you live with having to pick and choose?” Halvorsen asked.

She said there were instances in which therapists had to stay on duty for 16 to 24 hours because they couldn't leave a patient.

Hurt also pointed to the need for ancillary staff for cleaning, and for specific cleaning such as after tuberculosis patients, and not having that kind of help available.

While staff raised issues with quality of care, Sutter Lakeside leadership told Lake County News in an emailed statement afterward, “Our hospital has received a five-star rating for overall hospital quality from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and multiple ‘A’ grades from The Leapfrog Group for hospital safety — recognitions that reflect our commitment to preventing errors and ensuring patient well-being and placing us among the top 10% of hospitals nationwide.”

Regarding the concerns about respiratory therapy, staffing levels and safety, the hospital said it’s “committed to providing the highest standard of care, including ensuring that respiratory therapists and all clinical staff have the support they need to care for patients safely and effectively. Staffing is continuously monitored and adjusted to meet patient needs, and we follow strict protocols to prioritize patient safety at all times. We also offer clear and accessible channels for staff to surface their concerns directly to leadership so they can be addressed.”

Union officials said they started negotiations with Sutter on July 24. The last time they ended negotiations on a contract was in December 2021, and those had required a federal negotiator to bring them to a conclusion.

As she watched staff come out on their breaks to join her and her fellow picketers, Halvorsen said, “I am so proud of this little facility.”

A picket took place at Sutter Santa Rosa on Monday. In addition to Santa Rosa and Lakeport, rolling pickets are planned across six more Sutter facilities into next week. 

They include Sutter Solano in Vallejo, 10 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 14; Alta Bates, Berkeley, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday, Aug. 18; Roseville, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., Tuesday, Aug. 19; California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 21; Sutter Eden, Castro Valley, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Friday, Aug. 22; and Sutter Delta, Antioch, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday, Aug. 25.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social. 

SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West members picket at Sutter Lakeside Hospital in Lakeport, California, on Tuesday, August 12, 2025. Photo by Elizabeth Larson/Lake County News.

Guenoc Valley resort project clears Planning Commission, advances to supervisors

The Guenoc Valley resort site, as shown in county planning documents. Photo courtesy of the county of Lake.


LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The Lake County Planning Commission on Friday took a major step that moves the Guenoc Valley project forward, approving the new environmental impact report and most permit requests for the large-scale, mixed-use resort and residential development project near Middletown.

The Guenoc Valley Mixed Use Planned Development Project is a luxury destination that at full buildout will include up to 400 hotel rooms, 450 resort residential units, 1,400 residential estates and 500 workforce co-housing units on a portion of the 16,000-acre, 82-parcel Guenoc property, according to the staff report.

The commission certified the project’s updated environmental impact report addressing wildfire risks and evacuation plans, and approved most of its permits and amendment requests, including zoning changes to create a new district for mixed-use development.

However, a motion to rezone part of the project’s Santa Clara site from single-family residential to two-family residential ended in a tie vote. Commissioners Everardo Chavez Perez and Batsulwin Brown supported the rezoning, while Monica Rosenthal and Sharron Zoller opposed it. Commissioner Maile Field was absent for the vote.

“I would prefer not to see the change in density,” said Rosenthal, citing the county’s newly approved housing plan, which aims to reduce the area’s housing density to 2.39 people per house in the next two decades. 

“So I have to question why we are proposing four and five bedroom units, and I'd very much like to see that in conformity with the current Middletown Area Plan,” she added.

Deputy County Counsel Nicole Johnson said that the tie vote amounts to an "automatic denial,” and triggers an appeal to the Board of Supervisors, which will hold a public hearing on the project Aug. 26.

Developer Jonathan Breene, one of the project’s three main partners, told commissioners the project could generate $3.8 billion in economic benefits for Lake County over 25 years, including $2.47 billion in labor income, $635 million in local taxes and $212 million in state taxes. It would also create an estimated 2,688 jobs annually.

Plans also include building a fire station operated by Cal Fire and five emergency refuge points. 

Kathleen Cutter, wildfire mitigation specialist at UC Berkeley, said onsite facilities and personnel will be essential during fires. “The response time is just a game changer,” she said. 

The project applicant, San Francisco-based Lotusland Investment Holdings, has owned the property since 2016. Its owner, Chinese developer Yiming Xu, moved from China to Canada in 1996. Since the early 2000s, he has been involved in various real estate and luxury resort developments in China. 

According to the project’s official website, the Guenoc Valley project development is now led by Breene, Indonesian hotelier Adrian Zecha and Yiming Xu’s son, Alex Xu.

Shifting community attitudes

The Planning Commission first discussed the project on July 24 but requested more time for review. Between that meeting and Friday’s vote, some commissioners and community representatives toured the site during visits organized by the developer, as they disclosed. 

Unlike in July — where commissioners, local agency representatives and residents mainly voiced concerns about the project over wildfire risks — Friday’s meeting brought mostly support for the project, with no broad objection, though some resistance remained to the higher-density housing proposal.

As she did at the previous meeting, Rev. Julia Bono of Rainbow Church in Middletown “vehemently” opposed the worker co-housing site proposed for Santa Clara Avenue as part of the project, citing the higher-density proposal’s incompatibility with the community’s strong preference for low density, single-family residential character of the town. 

Middletown Rancheria Vice Chair Larry Galupe voiced support for the project during public comment. It’s important to continue the conversations about development on the “culturally sensitive sites” for all the tribes, he said. “But I’m very excited about the opportunity of what could happen here for Lake County too.”

Farm Bureau Executive Director Rebecca Harper — who in July spoke against the project’s “significant and unavoidable impact” rezoning 325 acres of farmland — said that she had met with the developer representatives and many of the concerns were addressed. 

“A very minimal amount of the agricultural land that's proposed for rezoning will be intensively developed; the majority will remain in ag use,” Harper said during public comment. 

Harper also said that the project’s current mitigation measure to offset the loss of agricultural land on other parcels within 100 miles is too broad. “We believe that mitigation should be limited to land within Lake County.”

Questions about local ties and donations

Commissioner Field asked if the developer had made any donations to local communities, specifically mentioning the Lake County Chamber of Commerce. 

“The reason I’m asking is I hear things in the community and I want to hear it from the source,” Field said. 

Breene replied that Lotusland’s only significant local donation was $1 million in 2017 to assist with post-Valley Fire rebuilding. 

Lake County News reported at the time that the donation went to Hope City, a ministry of the faith-based Hope Crisis Response Network in partnership with a number of area churches. 

On the same day as Hope City received the call about Xu wanting to make a donation, Xu and the principals of his company introduced themselves and shared their early vision for the Guenoc Valley project over a dinner at Langtry House for dozens of community leaders.

Responding further to Field’s questions, Kevin Case, a partner with the developer, said they joined the Chamber of Commerce about three months ago. 

“If it's a donation, we sponsored an event at the Greenview golf club that was asked of us,” Case said, adding that they have also been to several auctions and donated money for auctions “for South Lake Fire, primarily, and for Cal Fire and those fundraisers.” 

“Everything’s done in a very ethical and legal manner. So I just want to go on record where we're not reckless at all with that; we're very, very calculated and do it the right way,” Case said. 

The discussion at the meeting did not include specific dollar amounts for these activities. 

End of legal fights?

By the end of August, the project will go before the Board of Supervisors — once again. 

The board first approved the project’s initial Environmental Impact Report, or EIR, in July 2020. 

Just two months later, the Center for Biological Diversity and the California Native Plant Society sued the county over the project, with the California Attorney General’s Office intervening in support of them. 

In January, 2022, Lake County Superior Court Judge J. David Markham ruled that the EIR was inadequate in its community evacuation analysis. 

The Center for Biological Diversity appealed the case, and in October 2024, the California First District Appellate Court ruled that a new EIR must be prepared as the previous document didn’t disclose the project’s wildfire ignition risks.

On July 25 of this year, the Attorney General’s Office issued a letter to Lotusland, intending to confirm that the developer has addressed the wildfire risk and evacuation requirements laid out in a January 2023 settlement agreement.

Then on Thursday — the day before the Planning Commission's vote — the developer and the two environmental groups announced a habitat conservation agreement to protect 3,717 acres of the Guenoc property, alongside implementation of measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with $2 million for additional off-site conservation.

At Friday’s meeting, the developer’s attorney, Robert Hodil, said the agreement means these acreage “will not be developed as part of this project and [will be] preserved in perpetuity, " responding to Lake County News’ question during public comment. 

Does this agreement mean the end of legal challenges to the project?

“The groups have agreed not to pursue legal action to challenge Phase 1 of the project, which is the phase of the project that’s up for approval,” said Peter Broderick, urban wildlands legal director and senior attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, in a phone call with Lake County News.

It does not guarantee the same for future phases, he said. 

Email staff reporters Lingzi Chen at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

For America’s 35M small businesses, tariff uncertainty hits especially hard


Imagine it’s April 2025 and you’re the owner of a small but fast-growing e-commerce business. Historically, you’ve sourced products from China, but the president just announced tariffs of 145% on these goods. Do you set up operations in Thailand – requiring new investment and a lot of work – or wait until there’s more clarity on trade? What if waiting too long means you miss your chance to pull it off?

This isn’t a hypothetical – it’s a real dilemma faced by a real business owner who spoke with one of us over coffee this past spring. And she’s not alone. As of 2023, of those U.S. companies that import goods, more than 97% of them were small businesses. For these companies, tariff uncertainty isn’t just frustrating – it’s paralyzing.

As a family business researcher and former deputy administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration and entrepreneur, we hear from a lot of small-business owners grappling with these challenges. And what they tell us is that tariff uncertainty is stressing their time, resources and attention.

The data backs up our anecdotal experience: More than 70% of small-business owners say constant shifts in trade policy create a “whiplash effect” that makes it difficult to plan, a recent national survey showed.

Unlike larger organizations with teams of analysts to inform their decision-making, small-business owners are often on their own. In an all-hands-on-deck operation, every hour spent focusing on trade policy news or filling out additional paperwork means precious time away from day-to-day, core operations. That means rapid trade policy shifts leave small businesses especially at a disadvantage.

Planning for stability in an uncertain landscape

Critics and supporters alike can agree: The Trump administration has taken an unpredictable approach to trade policy, promising and delaying new tariffs again and again. Consider its so-called “reciprocal” tariffs. Back in April, Trump pledged a baseline 10% tariff on imports from nearly everywhere, with extra hikes on many countries. Not long afterward, it hit pause on its plans for 90 days. That period just ended, and the administration followed up with a new executive order on July 31 naming different tariff rates for about 70 countries. The one constant has been change.

Bloomberg TV covers the administration’s “surprise announcements” on trade the day before a key self-imposed deadline.

This approach has upended long-standing trade relationships in a matter of days or weeks. And regardless of the outcomes, the uncertainty itself is especially disruptive to small businesses. One recent survey of 4,000 small-business owners found that the biggest challenge of tariff policies is the sheer uncertainty they cause.

This isn’t just a problem for small-business owners themselves. These companies employ nearly half of working Americans and play an essential role in the U.S. economy. That may partly explain why Americans overwhelmingly support small businesses, viewing them as positive for society and a key path for achieving the American dream. If you’re skeptical, just look at the growing number of MBA graduates who are turning down offers at big companies to buy and run small businesses.

But this consensus doesn’t always translate into policies that help small businesses thrive. In fact, because small businesses often operate on thinner margins and have less capacity to absorb disruptions, any policy shift is likely to be more difficult for them to weather than it would be for a larger firm with deeper pockets. The ongoing tariff saga is just the most recent example.

Slow, steady policies help small-business owners

Given these realities, we recommend the final negotiated changes to trade policy be rolled out slowly. Although that wouldn’t prevent businesses from facing supply chain disruptions, it would at least give them time to consider alternate suppliers or prepare in other ways. From the perspective of a small-business owner, having that space to plan can make a real difference.

Similarly, if policymakers want to bring more manufacturing back to the U.S., tariffs alone can accomplish only so much. Small manufacturers need to hire people, and with unemployment at just over 4%, there’s already a shortage of workers qualified for increasingly high-skilled manufacturing roles.

Making reshoring a true long-term policy objective would require creating pathways for legal immigration and investing significantly in job training. And if the path toward reshoring is more about automation than labor, then preparing small-business owners for the changes ahead and helping them fund growth strategically will be crucial.

Small businesses would benefit from more government-backed funding and training. The Small Business Administration is uniquely positioned to support small firms as they adjust their supply chains and manufacturing – it could offer affordable financing for imports and exports, restructure existing loans that small businesses have had to take on, and offer technical support and education on new regulations and paperwork. Unfortunately, the SBA has slashed 43% of its workforce and closed offices in major cities including Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, New Orleans and Los Angeles. We think this is a step in the wrong direction.

Universities also have an important role to play in supporting small businesses. Research shows that teaching core management skills can improve key business outcomes, such as profitability and growth. We recommend business and trade schools increase their focus on small firms and the unique challenges they face. Whether through executive programs for small-business owners or student consulting projects, universities have a significant opportunity to lean into supporting Main Street entrepreneurs.

Thirty-five million small businesses are the engine of the U.S. economy. They are the job creators in cities and towns across this country. They are the heartbeat of American communities. As the nation undergoes rapid and profound policy shifts, we encourage leaders in government and academia to take action to ensure that Main Streets across America not only endure but thrive.

The authors would like to thank Gretchen Abraham and Matt Sonneborn for their support.The Conversation

Peter Boumgarden, Professor of Family Enterprise, Washington University in St. Louis and Dilawar Syed, Associate Professor of Instruction, Department of Business, Government and Society, The University of Texas at Austin

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Thompson leads group seeking support for universal background checks

Following the mass shooting in a Midtown Manhattan office building in late July, Gun Violence Prevention Task Force Chairman Mike Thompson (CA-04), Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08), and Representative Jerrold Nadler (NY-12) led the New York Democratic delegation in a letter on Friday calling on every Republican representing New York in Congress to back universal background checks.  

In their letter, the lawmakers called on Representatives Nick LaLota (NY-01), Andrew Garbarino (NY-02), Nicole Malliotakis (NY-11), Mike Lawler (NY-17), Elise Stefanik (NY-21), Nick Langworthy (NY-23), and Claudia Tenney (NY-24) to sign on in support of Rep. Thompson’s bipartisan legislation establishing universal background checks for firearm purchases. 

“Every day, background checks stop more than 160 felons and some 50 domestic abusers from getting a gun from a federally licensed dealer. Unfortunately, in some states, those same prohibited purchasers can go to an unlicensed dealer and get a firearm without a background check,” wrote the lawmakers. 

“Importantly, this bill would make no changes for New Yorkers’ access to firearms as New York already has a strong universal state background law. The bill would reduce the flow of guns trafficked into New York and used by felons, domestic abusers and those with mental illnesses who are a danger to themselves or others. Over 80 percent of the guns traced at crime scenes in New York by the ATF originate from outside of New York with the most guns coming from Georgia.

“The Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025 is a commonsense approach supported by more than 80 percent of Republicans and 77 percent of self-described Second Amendment supporters in America. The bill would require that every sale of a firearm include a background check,” continued the lawmakers. 

The lawmakers went on to urge all Republican members representing constituents who live and work in New York City to cosponsor the bill en bloc on the one-month anniversary of the Manhattan mass shooting on August 28th.

Gun Violence Prevention Task Force Chairman Mike Thompson has introduced background check legislation every Congress since the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, which killed 20 children and six adult staff members. The Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025 (H.R. 18) is endorsed by 205 Members of Congress. 

Endorsing organizations for H.R. 18 include: GIFFORDS, Brady, Everytown for Gun Safety, March For Our Lives, Newtown Action Alliance, Sandy Hook Promise, and Equality California.

Representatives Mike Thompson (CA-04), Jerrold Nadler (NY-12), Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08), Timothy Kennedy (NY-26), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Grace Meng (NY-06), Patrick Ryan (NY-18), Paul Tonko (NY-20), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Ritchie Torres (NY-15), Gregory Meeks (NY-05), Yvette Clarke (NY-09), Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), and Nydia Velázquez (NY-07) signed onto the letter. 

Read the full letter below. 

Dear Congressman LaLota, Congressman Garbarino, Congresswoman Malliotakis, Congressman Lawler, Congresswoman Stefanik, Congressman Langworthy and Congresswoman Tenney,

In the wake of the deadliest mass shooting in New York City in 25 years, we invite you to cosponsor H.R. 18, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025.

As you may know, current law requires every federally licensed dealer to run a background check on every gun they sell. There is proof these background checks work. Every day, background checks stop more than 160 felons and some 50 domestic abusers from getting a gun from a federally licensed dealer. Unfortunately, in some states, those same prohibited purchasers can go to an unlicensed dealer and get a firearm without a background check.

Importantly, this bill would make no changes for New Yorkers’ access to firearms as New York already has a strong universal state background law. The bill would reduce the flow of guns trafficked into New York and used by felons, domestic abusers and those with mental illnesses who are a danger to themselves or others. Over 80 percent of the guns traced at crime scenes in New York by the ATF originate from outside of New York with the most guns coming from Georgia.

The Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2025 is a commonsense approach supported by more than 80 percent of Republicans and 77 percent of self-described Second Amendment supporters in America. The bill would require that every sale of a firearm include a background check. The bill includes exemptions for family transfers and temporary hunting transfers.

We understand the sensitivities around gun violence legislation and urge members representing constituents who live and work in New York City to cosponsor the bill en bloc on the one-month anniversary of the Manhattan mass shooting on August 28th.

To join as a cosponsor contact Rep. Mike Thompson’s office. Thank you for your consideration.

Thompson representS California’s Fourth Congressional District, which includes all or part of Lake, Napa, Solano, Sonoma and Yolo counties. 

Lucerne Elementary celebrates new playground ahead of start of school

Children enjoy  the new playground equipment at Lucerne Elementary School on Thursday, August 8, 2025. Photo by Elizabeth Larson/Lake County News.

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — As school gets ready to start this week, Lucerne Elementary School District has introduced its latest campus improvement project.

On Thursday, school leaders, staff and families gathered at the campus for a ribbon cutting for its newly renovated playground, which features a new play structure.

Children blew bubbles and admired the playground’s steps and slide while munching on frosted cookies with the school mascot, an eagle, in the school’s colors of blue and white.

The playground structure, which is seated on artificial turf that will help keep the area cleaner and safer, cost approximately $648,233, said Superintendent/Principal Megan Grant.

The funds came from Measure A, a 2016 school bond approved by Lucerne voters by a margin of 71.16 to 28.84 percent.

Lucerne Elementary Superintendent/Principal Megan Grant thanks the community, teachers and staff at the dedication of the new playground equipment at Lucerne Elementary School on Thursday, August 8, 2025. Photo by Elizabeth Larson/Lake County News.


Measure A provided the district with $4 million to conduct needed upgrades to the campus.

Grant said the bond funded three new classroom buildings — for a total of six classrooms — plus the playground.

She credited the community for supporting the bond, and the school board and the bond committee for their work to carry out the bond’s requirements.

““Our school is truly a special place and this is going to be an incredible edition,” Grant said.

Grant said it’s not just a playground, but a place to come together.

She reminded students that it will be up to them to help care for it.

School Board member Elise Jones, whose four children attended school in Lucerne, said it was easy to make the decisions related to the bond.

Another school board member, Nicole Zwinge, whose three children also attended Lucerne Elementary, then stepped up with a pair of large ceremonial scissors to cut the blue ribbon before the children charged up to start enjoying the playground.

Children wait to try out the new playground equipment at Lucerne Elementary School on Thursday, August 8, 2025. Photo by Elizabeth Larson/Lake County News.

Grant told Lake County News that the bond funds have been expended, although there are still some projects to complete.

Those include the construction of a storage building on 17th Avenue and the planned resurfacing of the rest of the playground and parking lot. 

The new playground is ready just in time for school, which begins on Wednesday. 

Grant said she didn’t have firm enrollment numbers yet, but students at the start of the school year are expected to total about 285.

Editor’s note: Editor Elizabeth Larson is a member of Lucerne Elementary’s bond oversight committee.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social. 

The new storage district storage building on 17th Avenue in Lucerne, California. Photo by Elizabeth Larson/Lake County News.



  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137

Community

  • Lake County Wine Alliance offers sponsor update; beneficiary applications open 

  • Mendocino National Forest announces seasonal hiring for upcoming field season

Public Safety

  • Lakeport Police logs: Thursday, Jan. 15

  • Lakeport Police logs: Wednesday, Jan. 14

Education

  • Woodland Community College receives maximum eight-year reaffirmation of accreditation from ACCJC

  • SNHU announces Fall 2025 President's List

Health

  • California ranks 24th in America’s Health Rankings Annual Report from United Health Foundation

  • Healthy blood donors especially vital during active flu season

Business

  • Two Lake County Mediacom employees earn company’s top service awards

  • Redwood Credit Union launches holiday gift and porch-to-pantry food drives

Obituaries

  • Rufino ‘Ray’ Pato

  • Patty Lee Smith

Opinion & Letters

  • The benefits of music for students

  • How to ease the burden of high electric bills

Veterans

  • CalVet and CSU Long Beach team up to improve data collection related to veteran suicides

  • A ‘Big Step Forward’ for Gulf War Veterans

Recreation

  • Wet weather trail closure in effect on Upper Lake Ranger District

  • Mendocino National Forest seeking public input on OHV grant applications

  • State Parks announces 2026 Anderson Marsh nature walk schedule 

  • BLM lifts seasonal fire restrictions in central California

Religion

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian to host Ash Wednesday service and Lenten dinner Feb. 18

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian Church to hold ‘Longest Night’ service Dec. 21

Arts & Life

  • Auditions announced for original musical ‘Even In Shadow’ set for March 21 and 28

  • ‘The Rip’ action heist; ‘Steal’ grounded in a crime thriller

Government & Politics

  • Lake County Democrats issue endorsements in local races for the June California Primary

  • County negotiates money-saving power purchase agreement

Legals

  • March 3 hearing on ordinance amending code for commercial cannabis uses

  • Feb. 12 public hearing on resolution to establish standards for agricultural roads

How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page