How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login

News

Want to make America healthy again? Stop fueling climate change

Extreme heat can threaten human health, but it’s only one way climate change puts lives at risk. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

If you’ve been following recent debates about health, you’ve been hearing a lot about vaccines, diet, measles, Medicaid cuts and health insurance costs – but much less about one of the greatest threats to global public health: climate change.

Anybody who’s fallen ill during a heat wave, struggled while breathing wildfire smoke or been injured cleaning up from a hurricane knows that climate change can threaten human health. Studies show that heat, air pollution, disease spread and food insecurity linked to climate change are worsening and costing millions of lives around the world each year.

The U.S. government formally recognized these risks in 2009 when it determined that climate change endangers public health and welfare.

However, the Trump administration is now moving to rescind that 2009 endangerment finding so it can reverse U.S. climate progress and help boost fossil fuel industries, including lifting limits on greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and power plants. The administration’s arguments for doing so are not only factually wrong, they’re deeply dangerous to Americans’ health and safety.

Health risks and outcomes related to climate change.
Health risks and outcomes related to climate change. World Health Organization

As physicians, epidemiologists and environmental health scientists who study these effects, we’ve seen growing evidence of the connections between climate change and harm to people’s health. More importantly, we see ways humanity can improve health by tackling climate change.

Here’s a look at the risks and some of the steps individuals and governments can take to reduce them.

Extreme heat

Greenhouse gases from vehicles, power plants and other sources accumulate in the atmosphere, trapping heat and holding it close to Earth’s surface like a blanket. Too much of it causes global temperatures to rise, leaving more people exposed to dangerous heat more often.

Most people who get minor heat illnesses will recover, but more extreme exposure, especially without enough hydration and a way to cool off, can be fatal. People who work outside, are elderly or have underlying illnesses such as heart, lung or kidney diseases are often at the greatest risk.

Heat deaths have been rising globally, up 23% from the 1990s to the 2010s, when the average year saw more than half a million heat-related deaths. Even in the U.S., the Pacific Northwest heat dome in 2021 killed hundreds of people.

Climate scientists predict that with advancing climate change, many areas of the world, including U.S. cities such as Miami, Houston, Phoenix and Las Vegas, will confront many more days each year hot enough to threaten human survival.

Extreme weather

Warmer air holds more moisture, so climate change brings increasing rainfall and storm intensity, worsening flooding, as many U.S. communities have experienced in recent years. Warm ocean water also fuels more powerful hurricanes.

Increased flooding carries health risks, including drownings, electrocution and water contamination from human pathogens and toxic chemicals. People cleaning out flooded homes also face risks from mold exposure, injuries and mental distress.

A man carries boxes out of a house that flooded up to its second story.
Flooding from hurricanes and other extreme storms can put people at risk of injuries during the cleanup while also triggering dangerous mold growth on wet wallboard, carpets and fabric. This home flooded up to its second flood during Hurricane Irma in 2017. Sean Rayford/Getty Images

Climate change also worsens droughts, disrupting food supplies and causing respiratory illness from dust and dry conditions as well as wildfires. And rising temperatures and aridity dry out forest and grasslands, making them more vulnerable to catching fire, which creates other health risks.

Air pollution

Wildfires, along with other climate effects, are also worsening air quality around the country.

Wildfire smoke is a toxic soup of microscopic particles (known as fine particulate matter, or PM2.5) that can penetrate deep in the lungs and hazardous compounds such as lead, formaldehyde and dioxins generated when homes, cars and other materials burn at high temperatures. Smoke plumes can travel thousands of miles downwind and trigger heart attacks and elevate lung cancer risks, among other harms.

Meanwhile, warmer conditions favor the formation of ground-level ozone, a heart and lung irritant. Burning of fossil fuels also generates dangerous air pollutants that cause a host of health problems, including heart attacks, strokes, asthma flare-ups and lung cancer.

Infectious diseases

Because they are cold-blooded organisms, insects are directly influenced by temperature. So as temperatures have risen, mosquito biting rates have risen as well. Warming also shortens the development time of disease agents that mosquitoes transmit.

Mosquito-borne dengue fever has turned up in Florida, Texas, Hawaii, Arizona and California. New York state just saw its first locally acquired case of chikungunya virus, also transmitted by mosquitoes.

A world map shows where mosquitos are most likely to transmit the dengue virus
As global temperatures rise, regions are becoming more suitable for mosquitoes to transmit dengue virus. The map shows a suitability scale, with red areas already suitable for dengue transmissions and yellow areas becoming more suitable. Taishi Nakase, et al., 2022, CC BY

And it’s not just insect-borne infections. Warmer temperatures increase diarrhea and foodborne illness from Vibrio cholerae and other bacteria and heavy rainfall increases sewage-contaminated stormwater overflows into lakes and streams. At the other water extreme, drought in the desert Southwest increases the risk of coccidioidomycosis, a fungal infection known as valley fever.

Other impacts

Climate change can threaten health in numerous other ways. Longer pollen seasons can increase allergen exposures. Lower crop yields can reduce access to nutritious foods.

Mental health can also suffer, with anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress following disasters, and increased rates of violent crime and suicide tied to high-temperature days.

A older man holds a door for a woman at a cooling center.
New York and many other cities now open cooling centers during heat waves to help residents, particularly older adults who might not have air conditioning at home, stay safe during the hottest parts of the day. Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images

Young children, older adults, pregnant women and people with preexisting medical conditions are among the highest-risk groups. Often, lower-income people are also at greater risk because of higher rates of chronic disease, higher exposures to climate hazards and fewer resources for protection, medical care and recovery from disasters.

What can people and governments do?

As an individual, you can reduce your risk by following public health advice during heat waves, storms and wildfires; protecting yourself against tick and mosquito bites; and spending time in green space that improves your mental health.

You can also make healthy choices that reduce your carbon footprint, such as:

  • Walking, biking or using public transit instead of driving, since more physical activity reduces chronic disease risks.

  • Rebalancing your diet from meat-heavy to plant-forward, which can cut your risk of heart disease and lower greenhouse gas emissions from meat production.

  • Making your home more energy-efficient and opting for electric rather than gas- or oil-powered heating and cooking, which can reduce emissions while improving indoor air quality.

However, there are limits to what individuals can do alone.

Actions by governments and companies are also necessary to protect people from a warmer climate and stop the underlying causes of climate change.

Workplace safety can be addressed through rules to reduce heat exposure for people who work outdoors in industries such as agriculture and construction. Communities can open cooling centers during heat waves, provide early warning systems and design drinking water systems that can handle more intense rainfall and runoff, reducing contamination risks.

Governments can ensure that public transit is available and not overly expensive to reduce the number of vehicles on the road. They can promote clean energy rather than fossil fuels to cut emissions, which can also save money since the cost of solar energy has dropped spectacularly. In fact, both solar and wind energy are less expensive than fossil fuel energy.

Yet the U.S. government is currently going in the opposite direction, cutting support for renewable energy while subsidizing the fossil fuel industries that endanger public health.

To really make America healthy, in our view, the country can’t ignore climate change.The Conversation

Jonathan Levy, Professor and Chair, Department of Environmental Health, Boston University; Howard Frumkin, Professor Emeritus of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington; Jonathan Patz, Professor of Environmental Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Vijay Limaye, Adjunct Associate Professor of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Community choice aggregation plan to reduce energy costs stalls due to Clearlake City Council vote, supervisors’ stance

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — Lake County’s bid to seek alternative power options is in limbo after more than six months of talks, with Clearlake rejecting the offer from Sonoma Clean Power, the Board of Supervisors choosing not to cast a formal vote and Lakeport left without an offer on the table.

It is less disputed that Lake County needs additional electricity options than which path to take. 

Still, joining Sonoma Clean Power, or SCP, to implement a community-based electricity procurement program called community choice aggregation, has remained the only option local jurisdictions have seriously explored so far this year. 

Yet after months of discussion from April through October, the three local governments have ended up collectively, de facto, saying no to signing the agreement at this moment.

Supporters of the deal emphasize the urgent need for alternative options to address soaring utility rates and limited choice in Lake County, while opponents — including most supervisors and some councilmembers — raise concerns about local authority and future decision-making under SCP’s governing structure.

On Oct. 2, the Clearlake City Council voted 3-2 against joining SCP, two days after a joint workshop where the 15 elected officials of all three jurisdictions met together on the matter for the first time. Mayor Ross Creamer and Vice Mayor Dirk Slooten voted in favor, with councilmembers Tara Downey, Jessica Hooten and Mary Wilson opposed.

On Oct. 21, the Board of Supervisors did not take a formal vote on the matter, but there was an apparent lack of majority support to move forward. Supervisors Brad Rasmussen and Jessica Pyska expressed support, while Bruno Sabatier, Helen Owen and Eddie Crandell raised doubts. 

The board discussion concluded with direction to staff to explore other service providers. It was brought up during the meeting that statewide there are 26 service providers of community choice aggregation, or CCA. 

“Exploration of further CCA options and development of an energy policy were among the next steps favored by individual supervisors,” County Administrative Analyst Trevor Mockel, who handles media inquiries, said in an email response to Lake County News on Oct 24. “Admin’s next step will be facilitating consideration of options; we anticipate general board discussion will occur before the end of the year in open session.”

However, Mockel did not address Lake County News’ questions about if the county reached out to other service providers when they contacted SCP — and why there wasn’t a request for proposals issued at the beginning of the process. 

“I will say that that was my mistake throughout this whole process — I should have asked that to happen when we agreed to reach out to Sonoma Clean Power,” Supervisor Bruno Sabatier told Lake County News during a phone interview on Oct. 27, when asked about reaching to other CCAs at an earlier time. “So I don't think that I was perfect in my process.”

Because SCP’s offer was intended for all three jurisdictions, and two chose not to advance it, by the evening of Oct. 21 when Lakeport was set to vote on the item, the offer no longer existed. Action by the Lakeport City Council to join, therefore, would have been moot, Lakeport City Manager Kevin Ingram told Lake County News in an email. 

Although no formal vote was taken, the majority of Lakeport City Council members expressed frustration at the Oct. 21 council meeting. 

“I wish we were a larger city where we could just go at it ourselves and not need the county support and the city of Clearlake support,” said Lakeport Mayor Pro Tem Brandon Disney.

This round of negotiation with SCP spanning more than half a year reached a formal pause following Lakeport Mayor Kim Costa calling the process “embarrassing” at the end of the council discussion. 

“It would be safe to summarize that the Lakeport City Council was disappointed in the outcome and feel that not joining SCP at this time represents a missed opportunity,” said Ingram in an email, adding that he had been instructed to continue talks with SCP and the county in exploring other CCA options. 

Supervisors have split views

SCP’s offer to Lake County includes lower utility costs, voluntary participation from residents, mandatory participation in their geothermal zone efforts that seek to develop geothermal projects in the future, and two seats for Lake County — one for the county and one for the city — on its governing board. 

While the SCP feasibility study suggests potential bill savings to be 4.2% to 12.9%, Supervisor Sabatier told Lake County News that his calculation shows the savings are about 2% over a course of 10 years. “So $2 out of every $100 you spend on energy,” he said.

Concerns raised during the three jurisdictions’ September joint workshop continued into the ensuing decision-making meetings in October. 

Those concerns include geothermal zone participation, lack of sufficient representation of Lake County voices on the SCP board, lack of formal tribal participation and record of SCP supporting Assembly Bill 531 regarding geothermal development that allows the state to bypass local authority. 

“It’s like a roulette bet,” said Supervisor Crandell at the Oct. 21 board meeting, likening the game to what SCP does by simultaneously supporting the legislative bill and promising Lake County strong local control. 

“I don't mean that in a negative way. I'm saying that any business or entity would basically bet on the number 21 and then put red just in case they hit both — either or,” Crandell added. “That's just what happens; that's just the way life is.”

Crandell also frowned upon the uncertainties of how the tribes would fit in the governance structure of SCP. 

The current 11 seats on the SCP board does not include any tribal representatives. 

SCP Chief Executive Officer Geof Syphers explained at the joint workshop that it was because the state law forming the CCA program did not consider tribes and decisions were made based on votes of the counties and cities involved. 

As Lake County continues to fight against decommissioning the Potter Valley Project, concerns were raised about Sonoma County Water Agency being one of the two “parties” in the joint party agreement along with County of Sonoma. In the meantime, Lake County is listed as a “participant” among other cities in the program.

The water agency is a key player of “Two-basin Solution Partnership” which local leaders believe seeks to exclude Lake County’s interests from the beginning for the Potter Valley situation.

“I have issues with Sonoma Water,” Supervisor Sabatier said at the meeting, pointing toward the conflicting interests. “I feel uncomfortable in building that relationship right now. It's bad timing.”

“I think there's been times we've worked okay with them, but most of the time it's been we haven't really had a voice,” Crandell later said. 

Supervisor Owen said she wanted more research, more options on the table and did not want to be locked into a 20-year commitment. 

“I don't want to hinder what else might be on the horizon,” Owen said. 

Many of those who spoke against joining SCP’s geothermal zone during public comment cited that the SCP would be able to bypass local authorization and get approval from the state, as the new law permits. 

Whereas Supervisor Rasmussen said joining SCP now would give Lake County an advantage instead, in the face of the new legislation.

“Geothermal is going to happen here, no matter what it is,” Rasmussen said. 

“Somebody is going to propose projects, try to put projects in and with the current state law — there's projects that the state can approve that we have no say in,” he said. “So if we have a partnership with somebody such as Sonoma Clean Power, who has the expertise for this kind of development, I think that puts us in a better position to drive what geothermal projects we would want in our community.”

Supervisor Pyska emphasized the importance and urgency of developing an option outside of Pacific Gas and Electric, with the cost of life in all aspects on the rise, including energy. 

“So we look at all these compounding costs for our residents — it is crushing, and it will continue to crush,” she said. “And so if we were to join this, maybe the first year or two, it's not a significant saving. Maybe it is, if we are able to produce more energy here, and that is what this geo zone opportunity is.”

A decade of search meets another delay

In the span of a decade, Lake County has requested three times to join the SCP. In 2015, the SCP said it was not ready for expansion. In 2019, the SCP conducted a feasibility study that showed unfavorable market conditions, concluding that it was not able to offer a competitive rate. 

Finally this year, the updated feasibility study SCP conducted in May showed market and regulatory conditions had improved and rates might go down. 

“This has been a long time coming,” said former Supervisor Denise Rushing during public comment.

Rushing was among the few who showed up in strong support of closing the deal at the board meeting. “It's a quiet decision with enormous opportunity for us. It could shape our energy future.”

“This is a conversation that predates all of us on this board,” Pyska said. “ It does seem new, and it could seem rushed, but it's not.”

Pyska added, “We could kick it down the road and say, maybe we'll get a better deal — but maybe we won't. This is the deal that we've been working on for a really long time. I think we just need to make this decision and move forward.”

However, the deal with SCP wasn’t closed. The supervisors decided not to vote so that conversations could stay open and explorations with other agencies may go on. 

Syphers of SCP, who had engaged in trips and presentations in Lake County over the past months, expressed frustration. 

“I don't want to sugarcoat it. It does matter to get some closure on it. And I don't want to be spending another year going through and having multiple staff coming over the hill and going over the hill while you're exploring things with other organizations and things like that,” he said. 

At the Lakeport City Council meeting, Syphers said SCP had spent about $90,000 in two feasibility studies they conducted and made 15 to 20 trips to Lake County this year. 

If Lake County did decide to join SCP in October, service would not begin until May 2027. 

So now what does the timeline may look like for Lake County residents to have alternative power options? 

“Well, let’s hope that within the year that we get good information back and good opportunities and see if we have an alternative that we want to go with,” Sabatier told Lake County News. 

Editor's note: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated that the Clearlake City Council vote was 3-0. It was in fact 3-2.

Email staff reporter Lingzi Chen at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Missing person alert: Timothy Reed

Timothy Reed. Courtesy photo.

CLEARLAKE, Calif. — The Clearlake Police Department is asking for the community’s help in locating a missing man.

Timothy Reed, 34, was last seen in the Clearlake area.

Reed is a white male adult, standing 5 feet 6 inches tall and weighing 154 pounds. He has brown hair and brown eyes. Police do not have a description of his clothing when he was last seen. 

If you have information regarding his whereabouts please contact the Clearlake Police Department at 707-994-8251, Extension 1 for dispatch. 

Little Hoover Commission plans virtual hearing on data centers and California electricity policy

The Little Hoover Commission invites the public to join them on Thursday, Nov. 20, at 2 p.m. for a hearing on data centers and California electricity policy.

This hearing will focus on framing the landscape around data centers and California's electricity system, and will feature expert testimony from academic, technological, ratepayer, energy and environmental perspectives.

The full agenda, along with the background materials provided to commissioners can be accessed here.
 
Join online or by phone via Zoom; the Webinar ID is 948 7155 8985, passcode 234306, phone 888-788-0099.

Though not the main focus of this hearing, the commission will also consider a draft report on state grantmaking and contracting with nonprofits. 

The following commissioners will attend the hearing remotely: Pedro Nava, Anthony Cannella, Dion Aroner, David Beier, Senator Christopher Cabaldon, Assemblymember Phillip Chen, Gil Garcetti, José Atilio Hernández, Jason Johnson, Gayle Miller, Senator Roger Niello, Assemblymember Liz Ortega and Janna Sidley.

The hearing will also be accessible at 925 L St., Suite 175, Sacramento. No commissioners or witnesses will be present at this location. 
 
Witnesses will include Elise Torres, energy team assistant managing attorney, The Utility Reform Network, or TURN; Liang Min, managing director of Bits & Watts Initiative, Precourt Institute for Energy [Stanford University]; Linda Taub Gordon, climate researcher and supervising attorney, UC Berkeley Human Rights Center; Masheika Allgood, founder, AllAI Consulting LLC; and Natalie Mims Frick, department leader and energy policy researcher, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Members of the public will have the opportunity to make comment at the end of the hearing. If you would like to make a public comment please use the "raise hand" feature in Zoom or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with your question and the phone number from which you joined the hearing.

The Little Hoover Commission is America’s only permanent, independent citizens commission working to improve state government. A nonpartisan oversight agency created in 1962, the commission includes 13 commissioners appointed by the governor and legislative leaders. The commission’s mission is to investigate state operations and promote efficiency, economy and improved service.

What America’s divided and tumultuous politics of the late-19th century can teach us

Can today’s divided America learn something from the divisions of the past? zimmytws, iStock/Getty Images Plus

People trying to understand politics in the United States today often turn to history for precedents and perspective. Are our current divisions like the ones that preceded the American Revolution or the Civil War? Did the dramatic events of the 1960s generate the same kind of social and political forces seen today? Are there lessons from the past that show us how eras of intense political turmoil eventually subside?

As a scholar of American politics and the presidency, I believe one American historical period is especially worth revisiting in this turbulent moment in the U.S.: the 20 tumultuous years between the presidencies of Ulysses S. Grant and William McKinley in the second half of the 19th century.

The two decades between 1876 and 1896 are usually remembered as a time when the cities in the East grew rich and the West was wild – a “Gilded Age” in New York City and gunslingers on the frontier.

It was also a time when Americans struggled with immigration issues, racial injustice, tariff levels, technological change, economic volatility and political violence.

There was even a president, Grover Cleveland, who served two nonconsecutive terms in the White House – the only time that happened before Donald Trump.

In the elections between Grant and McKinley, the nation was closely divided. No president in those years – not Rutherford Hayes, James Garfield, Chester Arthur, Cleveland or Benjamin Harrison – served for two consecutive terms. No presidential candidate won more than 50% of the popular vote, except the Democrat Samuel Tilden. And Tilden, after winning 50.1% of the ballots cast in 1876, lost in the Electoral College. That happened again in 1888 when Cleveland, the first time he was seeking a second term, won the popular vote but failed in the Electoral College.

The narrow victories that characterized presidential politics in the 1870s and 1880s were matched by constant shifts on Capitol Hill. In the 20 years between Grant and McKinley, there were only six years of unified government, when one political party controlled the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. In the remaining 14 years, presidents encountered opposition in Congress.

The U.S. has the same kind of divided politics today.

Heating up partisanship and raising stakes

President Bill Clinton had two years of unified government; President George W. Bush had less than that. Barack Obama, Donald Trump in his first term and Joe Biden all came into office with party majorities in the House and Senate, and then, like Clinton, their parties lost the House two years later.

Divided politics, with close elections and neither party in power for very long, make partisanship more intense, campaigns harder fought and the stakes sky high whenever voters go to the polls. That’s part of what produced instability in the second half of the 19th century and part of what produces it today.

Divided government is, of course, one of the most powerful “checks” in the constitutional system of checks and balances. Intense competition between political parties can prevent the national government from making rash decisions and serious mistakes. It can sometimes generate compromise.

Protesters in a cloud of tear gas face off against a federal agent with a gun.
Residents and protesters clash with federal agents on Chicago’s East Side on Oct. 14, 2025. Joshua Lott/The Washington Post via Getty Images

But there’s a cost. Political division can also allow critical problems to fester for far too long. The dramatic changes brought on by the Industrial Revolution after the Civil War were not seriously addressed in federal legislation until the Progressive Era early in the 20th century.

In the second half of the 19th century, Congress raised or lowered tariffs – depending on which party controlled the White House and Capitol Hill. The nation debated immigration but only once passed meaningful legislation, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. A long list of issues connected to railroads, banks, currency, civil service, corruption and the implementation of the post-Civil War constitutional amendments were ignored or only partially addressed.

When major legislation was passed in 1883 to create a merit-based civil service – reforming the spoils system of political appointments – it passed because Garfield’s 1881 assassination by a disgruntled federal job seeker temporarily pushed the issue to the top of the national agenda.

Immigration, fake news and riots

Political violence accompanied the period of closely divided national elections in the 1870s and 1880s.

In the 1880 presidential campaign, both candidates – the Republican, Garfield, and the Democrat, Winfield Hancock – called for restrictions on Chinese immigration to the United States. Neither supported the complete ban that many Westerners wanted.

But just before Americans went to the polls, newspapers across the country printed a letter, allegedly written and signed by Garfield, that endorsed an open border to Chinese immigrants. Before anyone could learn that the letter was a fake, there was public uproar. In Denver, an angry mob burned down all the homes in Chinese neighborhoods.

There were more incidents of political violence: anti-Chinese riots in Los Angeles in 1871, in San Francisco in 1877 and in Seattle in 1886.

Throughout the 1880s, anti-immigrant nativists targeted immigrants from Italy and sometimes vandalized Catholic churches.

Political violence in the South successfully suppressed Black voting rights and reestablished white control of state and local politics.

A scene of mourners at the deathbed of President James Garfield.
Political violence accompanied the period of closely divided national elections in the 1870s and 1880s, including the assassination of President James Garfield in 1881. Glasshouse Vintage/Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Realignment

Political division in the second half of the 19th century produced more problems than solutions. How and when did it end, or become less intense?

The simple answer is what political scientists call a “realignment,” a major shift in national electoral patterns.

In 1893, the first year of Cleveland’s second term, the nation suffered a financial crisis followed by a severe economic depression. As a result, McKinley was able to win solid victories in 1896 and 1900 and build a Republican coalition that dominated presidential politics until the election in 1932 of Democrat Franklin Roosevelt.

It’s not hard to imagine how an economic disaster, or a crisis of some kind, could shake the country out of a period of closely divided politics. But that’s a painful way of building a higher level of national unity.

Can it happen when large numbers of voters get thoroughly frustrated by languishing issues, swings back and forth in Washington, nasty elections and rising political violence?

Perhaps.

But either way – responding to crisis or finding a public change of heart – is a reminder that voters are the ultimate arbiters in a functioning democracy. Today, as in late-19th-century America, elections make a difference. They can mark continued division or they can take the nation in a new, and perhaps more unified, direction.The Conversation

Robert A. Strong, Senior Fellow, Miller Center, University of Virginia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Supervisors to consider hunger relief actions and $390,000 loan request to county department

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The Board of Supervisors this week will consider declaring a local disaster due to food insecurity, approving $60,000 over three weeks to address the crisis, and granting a $390,000 loan to the Community Development Department’s Building Division, which is operating at a deficit.

The‌ ‌board will meet beginning ‌at‌ ‌9‌ ‌a.m. Tuesday, Nov. 18, in the board chambers on the first floor of the Lake County Courthouse, 255 N. Forbes St., Lakeport.

The‌ ‌meeting‌ ‌can‌ ‌be‌ ‌watched‌ ‌live‌ ‌on‌ ‌Channel‌ ‌8, ‌online‌ ‌at‌ ‌https://countyoflake.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx‌‌ and‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌county’s‌ ‌Facebook‌ ‌page. ‌Accompanying‌ ‌board‌ ‌documents, ‌the‌ ‌agenda‌ ‌and‌ ‌archived‌ ‌board‌ ‌meeting‌ ‌videos‌ ‌also‌ ‌are‌ ‌available‌ ‌at‌ ‌that‌ ‌link. ‌ ‌

To‌ ‌participate‌ ‌in‌ ‌real-time, ‌join‌ ‌the‌ ‌Zoom‌ ‌meeting‌ ‌by‌ ‌clicking‌ ‌this‌ ‌link‌. ‌ ‌

The‌ ‌meeting‌ ‌ID‌ ‌is‌ 865 3354 4962, ‌pass code 726865.‌ ‌The meeting also can be accessed via one tap mobile at +16694449171,,86533544962#,,,,*726865#. The meeting can also be accessed via phone at 669 900 6833.

At 11 a.m., the board will hear a presentation on the county’s water quality outreach study, funded by a 2022 grant by the Blue-Ribbon Committee for the rehabilitation of Clear Lake. 

“This presentation is intended to inform future funding and outreach strategies and support continued community engagement in Clear Lake water quality efforts,” the staff memo said.

At 11:15 a.m., the board will consider a request to use previously approved stormwater matching funds to cover costs associated with managing the Big Valley Groundwater Basin.

In 2019, the Big Valley Groundwater sustainability agency was formed to develop a sustainability plan for Big Valley, in order to comply with state law. An initial $1.3 million was granted to the agency by the state in 2021, used in initial reporting, consulting, meetings and other expenses in developing the plan. 

However, the county’s application for additional funds was denied, according to the staff memo from the Water Resources Department.

“This left the department without resources needed to execute the mandated requirements set within the law,” the staff memo said, adding that noncompliance will result in “the loss of control over our groundwater resources to the state, a development that must be avoided.”

To close that gap, the department is requesting approval to use previously allocated stormwater matching funds, of which only about $50,000 of the original $500,000 has been spent.

At 4 p.m., the board will consider an update from the ad hoc committee formed two weeks ago to address local food insecurity in the face of federal food benefits delays.

The update will include the status of CalFresh and demands on local food banks and feeding partners. It will also discuss potential impact of H.R. 1 and loss of Affordable Care Act subsidy.

In the staff memo, Social Services Director Rachael Dillman Parsons is recommending the board declare a local disaster due to food insecurity and is requesting additional administrative funding for hunger relief of $20,000 per week for the next three weeks. 

“While November 2025 CalFresh benefits have been restored for most households, the future of food stability remains unclear,” Dillman Parsons said, emphasizing the continuing food insecurity in Lake County due to uncertainties in federal policies. 

In the untimed items, the board will consider a request for a short-term loan of $390,000 to the Community Development Department Building Division.

The staff memo indicated that the division is “currently operating under a budget deficit driven by a significant decline in permitting revenue resulting from broader market conditions.”

As of Friday — about 42% into the fiscal year — the division had spent $283,662 on salaries, or 78% of the $364,925 they expected to have used by this point, according to the staff memo.

The staff memo attributed the deficits to a large decline in permitting and service fees generated year-to-date. 

The division had been projected to generate $868,280 by this time. However, the actual revenue was only $556,525, falling short by $311,755.

Despite measures to freeze all discretionary spending, “the division requires temporary loan support to meet payroll obligations and maintain the staffing levels necessary to fulfill statutory responsibilities, ensure public safety, and avoid service disruptions that would further impact revenue,” the staff memo said. 

Right before the June budget hearings, the board approved a series of raises for county employees for the next four years. Salary increases in the first year alone is $5,206,119.25,

The full agenda follows.

CONSENT AGENDA

5.1: Approve continuation of emergency proclamation declaring a shelter crisis in the County of Lake.

5.2: Approve continuation of proclamation of the existence of a local emergency due to pervasive tree mortality.

5.3: Approve continuation of proclamation declaring a Clear Lake Hitch emergency.

5.4: Adopt proclamation recognizing November 17 through November 21, 2025 as California Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Week.

5.5: Adopt the resolution of application requesting the dissolution of the Scotts Valley Water Conservation District pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

5.6: Approve Amendment No. 3 to agreement to services contract between the County of Lake and William Conwell for indigent defense services and authorize the Board Chair to sign.

5.7: Adopt resolution approving an MOU with the Lake County Resource Conservation District for management of Goat's Rue in Lake County for July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028, in the amount of $119,998.80.

5.8: Approve the first amendment to the memorandum of understanding between the Lake County Department of Social Services and Lake County Behavioral Health Services for the shared provision of Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) conservatorship services.

5.9: Approve Board of Supervisors meeting minutes October 28, 2025.

5.10: Approve request to close County Library, Lakeport Branch to the public for the month of December 2025 for construction.

5.11: Approve request to close the Probation Department on Thursday, December 11, 2025, from 11:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for all-staff training.

5.12: Adopt resolution expressing support for the Lower Lake HoliDAZE Street Fair, and temporarily authorizing a road closure, prohibiting parking, authorizing removal of vehicles, and ordering the posting of signs.

5.13: Approve contract between the County of Lake and Bennet Omalu Pathology for a three-year cost plan and fee schedule for pathology services at an estimated cost of $765,000 per year and authorize the Chair to sign.

5.14: Sitting as the Lake County Sanitation District Board of Directors, approve Amendment No. 4 to the Joint Operating Agreement Southeast Geysers Effluent Pipeline Project and the Clear Lake Water Supply Agreement and authorize the Chair to sign.

TIMED ITEMS

6.1, 9:06 a.m.: Public input.

6.2, 9:03 a.m.: Pet of the Week.

6.3, 9:05 a.m.: Presentation of proclamation recognizing November 17 through November 21, 2025 as California Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Week.

6.4, 9:30 a.m.: Consideration of the June 30, 2025 report of Lake County pooled investments and the September 30, 2025 report of Lake County pooled investments.

6.5, 10:30 a.m.: PUBLIC HEARING—Consideration of ordinance to amend Chapter 21, Article 27 of the Lake County Code for commercial cannabis uses (staff requests continuance to a future meeting).

6.6, 11:00 a.m.: Sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County Watershed Protection District, accept staff presentation on water quality in Clear Lake outreach perspectives project updates.

6.7, 11:15 a.m.: Consideration of expanded use of previously approved stormwater matching funds to support groundwater management activities under SGMA and accept staff presentation on the Big Valley Groundwater Sustainability Plan Advisory Committee update.

6.8, 11:30 a.m.: PUBLIC HEARING—Consideration of draft ordinance amending Chapter 21, Articles 11 and 12 of the Lake County Zoning Code to implement General Plan Housing Element Policy HE-58 pertaining to affordable housing.

6.9, 1:00 p.m.: Consideration of workshop on a potential Community Facilities District for the Guenoc Mixed-Use Project.

6.10, 1:30 p.m.: Consideration of presentation from Nielsen Merksamer on the 2025 legislative session and potential areas of emphasis for 2026.

6.11, 2:00 p.m.: PUBLIC HEARING—Consideration of adoption of addendum to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the South Main Street and Soda Bay Road widening and bike lanes project.

6.12, 2:15 p.m.: Consideration of ordinance amending Article VI of Chapter 18 Lake County Code to include enforcement measures and associated due process requirements for cannabis cultivation-related taxes.

6.13, 2:30 p.m.: Consideration of ordinance amending Article VIII of Chapter 18 of the Lake County Code to implement a low value property tax exemption.

6.14, 4:00 p.m.: Consideration of update from the Food Insecurity Ad Hoc Workgroup, approval of a local disaster declaration due to food insecurity, approval of additional funding for hunger relief, and direction to staff.

NON-TIMED ITEMS

7.1: Supervisors’ weekly calendar, travel and reports.

7.2: Consideration of appointments of a director and alternate to the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) Board of Directors for 2026.

7.3: Consideration of board appointments of the 2026 Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC), Golden State Connect Authority (GSCA), Golden State Finance Authority (GSFA), and RCRC Environmental Services Joint Powers Authority (ESJPA) delegates and alternates.

7.4: Consideration of amendment between County of Lake and CliftonLarsonAllen LLP for accounting and advisory services; an increase of $200,000 total compensation not to exceed $350,000.

7.5: Consideration of resolution amending Resolution No. 2001-73 establishing an Underground Utilities District for South Main Street and Soda Bay Road.

7.6: Consideration of resolution authorizing a short-term loan in the amount of $390,000 to the Community Development Department Building Division.

ASSESSMENT APPEAL HEARINGS (BOARD OF EQUALIZATION)

8.1, 10:00 a.m.: Consideration of stipulation of assessment appeal applications No. 32-2024 and 33-2024, Lots of Realty.

8.2, Consideration of withdrawal of assessment appeal applications: a) No. 26-2024 Jeffery Anderson; and b) 28-2024, 16-2021, 24-2022, and 14-2023 Tesla.

8.3, Consideration of continuation of assessment appeal application No. 22-2024, Matthew Barbato & Kristin Barbato Trust.

8.4, Consideration of denial of assessment appeal applications: a) No. 34-2024 Waste Connections of California Inc.; b) 35-2024 Quakenbush Mountain Resource Recovery & Compost Facility, LLC; c) 36-2024 South Lake Refuse Company; and d) Mendocino Leasing Company Inc. due to lack of response from the applicant.

8.5, Consideration of assessment appeal applications No. 39-2024 through 46-2024, Gavin McIntyre.

CLOSED SESSION

9.1, 3:00 p.m.: Public employee appointment pursuant to Gov. Code section 54957(b)(1): interviews for Chief Public Defender; appointment of Chief Public Defender.

9.2, Sitting as the Board of Directors of the Lake County IHSS Public Authority, conference with negotiators regarding SEIU Local 2015.

9.3, Conference with legal counsel: existing litigation pursuant to Gov. Code sec. 54956.9(d)(1)—FERC Proceeding No. P-77, Potter Valley Hydroelectric Project.

9.4, Conference with legal counsel: decision whether to initiate litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(4)—one potential case.

Email staff reporter Lingzi Chen at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. 

  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69

Community

  • Lake County Wine Alliance offers sponsor update; beneficiary applications open 

  • Mendocino National Forest announces seasonal hiring for upcoming field season

Public Safety

  • Lakeport Police logs: Thursday, Jan. 15

  • Lakeport Police logs: Wednesday, Jan. 14

Education

  • Woodland Community College receives maximum eight-year reaffirmation of accreditation from ACCJC

  • SNHU announces Fall 2025 President's List

Health

  • California ranks 24th in America’s Health Rankings Annual Report from United Health Foundation

  • Healthy blood donors especially vital during active flu season

Business

  • Two Lake County Mediacom employees earn company’s top service awards

  • Redwood Credit Union launches holiday gift and porch-to-pantry food drives

Obituaries

  • Rufino ‘Ray’ Pato

  • Patty Lee Smith

Opinion & Letters

  • The benefits of music for students

  • How to ease the burden of high electric bills

Veterans

  • CalVet and CSU Long Beach team up to improve data collection related to veteran suicides

  • A ‘Big Step Forward’ for Gulf War Veterans

Recreation

  • Wet weather trail closure in effect on Upper Lake Ranger District

  • Mendocino National Forest seeking public input on OHV grant applications

  • State Parks announces 2026 Anderson Marsh nature walk schedule 

  • BLM lifts seasonal fire restrictions in central California

Religion

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian to host Ash Wednesday service and Lenten dinner Feb. 18

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian Church to hold ‘Longest Night’ service Dec. 21

Arts & Life

  • Auditions announced for original musical ‘Even In Shadow’ set for March 21 and 28

  • ‘The Rip’ action heist; ‘Steal’ grounded in a crime thriller

Government & Politics

  • Lake County Democrats issue endorsements in local races for the June California Primary

  • County negotiates money-saving power purchase agreement

Legals

  • March 3 hearing on ordinance amending code for commercial cannabis uses

  • Feb. 12 public hearing on resolution to establish standards for agricultural roads

How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page