How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page

News

Schools urged to immediately restrict cell phones in the classroom ahead of the new school year

Details
Written by: Lake County News reports
Published: 15 August 2024
In a letter to California schools, Gov. Gavin Newsom this week called on every school district to restrict smartphone use in classrooms as the new academic year begins.

In his letter, the governor applauds districts that have already implemented cell phone restrictions, like Los Angeles Unified, and reminded education leaders of the mental health, scholastic, and social risks of cell phone use in classrooms.

In 2019, Gov. Newsom signed AB 272 (Muratsuchi) into law, which grants school districts the authority to regulate the use of smartphones during school hours.

Building on that legislation, he is currently working with the California Legislature to further limit student smartphone use on campuses.

In June, the governor announced efforts to restrict the use of smartphones during the school day.

A copy of the letter can be found here and below:

Dear School Leaders,

As we strive to create the best learning environment for all students this new academic year, I write today to raise an urgent issue that affects their well-being: the pervasive use of smartphones in schools.

Excessive smartphone use among youth is linked to increased anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 72% of high school and 33% of middle school teachers report cell phone distractions as a major problem. Common Sense Media found that 97% of students use their phones during the school day for a median of 43 minutes. Combined with the U.S. Surgeon General’s warning about the risks of social media, it is urgent to provide reasonable guardrails for smartphone use in schools.

As I work with the Legislature to further limit student smartphone use on campus, there is no reason for schools to wait. In 2019, I signed AB 272 (Muratsuchi) into law, which grants school districts the authority to regulate the use of smartphones during school hours. This legislation was a crucial step in our efforts to minimize distractions and foster a more conducive environment for our students to learn. It is imperative that school districts take full advantage of this law to address the growing concerns surrounding student well-being and academic performance.

Leveraging the tools of this law, I urge every school district to act now to restrict smartphone use on campus as we begin the new academic year. The evidence is clear: reducing phone use in class leads to improved concentration, better academic outcomes, and enhanced social interactions. Schools and districts, including Santa Barbara Unified and Bullard High in Fresno, have seen positive impacts of limiting smartphones on campus, with some reporting higher test scores, grades, and student engagement, and less bullying and damage to school facilities. I applaud these districts, and others like LA Unified, for their leadership.

Every classroom should be a place of focus, learning, and growth. Working together, educators, administrators, and parents can create an environment where students are fully engaged in their education, free from the distractions on the phones and pressures of social media. Thank you for your continued dedication to our students and support in making our schools the best they can be.

Sincerely,

Governor Gavin Newsom

LGBTQ people have a troubled relationship with police − new survey shows high rates of harassment, abuse and distrust

Details
Written by: Stefan Vogler, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Published: 15 August 2024

 

Participants in the 2023 San Francisco Pride parade show their opposition to law enforcement. Chelsea Guglielmino/Getty Images

The LGBTQ community’s long history with law enforcement is so troubled and violent that organizers at some recent Pride parades decided to ban police from marching in the parade.

Throughout the 20th century, the police would routinely raid gay bars, rounding up patrons and taking them to jail. Sometimes, the names and photos of those arrested were published in newspapers – with potentially dire social and economic consequences.

Police departments across the country have taken steps in recent years to improve relations with the LGBTQ community, creating LGBTQ liaison officer positions and mandating sensitivity trainings. Yet raids continue to occur sporadically. In January 2024, police officers entered four gay bars in Seattle unannounced, allegedly taking pictures of customers and citing at least one bartender for having an exposed nipple in violation of city policy.

And that’s not the only reason the relationship between police and LGBTQ people remains fraught.

Insulting language and abuse

I am a sociologist who studies gender and sexuality. To understand LGBTQ people’s experience with and attitudes toward police, I recently conducted a study of LGBTQ-police relations alongside professor Valerie Jenness, my colleague at the University of California, Irvine.

This first-of-its-kind national survey of both LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ people drew on a nationally representative sample of 1,598 people – a gold standard for sociological survey research – followed by in-depth interviews with 59 LGBTQ survey participants.

The results, some of which were recently published in a report co-authored with the American Civil Liberties Union were eye-opening.

Our study found that LGBTQ people still face more police mistreatment than non-LGBTQ people and have less trust in the police. Perhaps unsurprisingly, they are also significantly more reluctant to call the police for help.

At the broadest level, we found that LGBTQ people are more likely to be stopped, searched, arrested and held in custody than non-LGBTQ people. Just under 15% of non-LGBTQ respondents had experienced this kind of police-initiated contact in the past year, compared with 21% of LGBTQ people and 33% of transgender respondents.

Those interactions with police are often uglier for LGBTQ people than non-LGBTQ people, especially bisexual, transgender, nonbinary people and queer people – that is, those who identify outside of traditional “gay” and “lesbian” labels. Approximately a quarter of all bisexual and queer survey respondents had experienced insulting language during a police interaction.

These numbers were even higher for transgender and nonbinary people – 45% and 33%, respectively. One transgender woman we interviewed described, for instance, how police officers purposefully used the wrong gender when referring to her, asked her “what” she was and used anti-LGBTQ slurs.

Black transgender people were the most likely to have experienced police violence. Fifty-three percent said they’d been hit, beaten, pushed or otherwise physically assaulted by police, compared with 25% of white transgender respondents. In contrast, only 8% of white cisgender men said that they had been the victims of police brutality.

This data powerfully demonstrate how gender, sexual identity and race all intersect to influence police treatment.

Afraid to call the cops

Given these findings, it is perhaps unsurprising that LGBTQ people, on average, rated the fairness of their police interactions approximately 12% lower than their non-LGBTQ peers.

Again, bisexual and queer people reported lower perceptions of fairness in their police interactions than gay and lesbian people. Meanwhile, transgender and nonbinary people reported worse perceptions of fairness than cisgender LGBQ people.

Consequently, LGBTQ people also reported less trust in the police than their non-LGBTQ counterparts, though this varied significantly by race.

Black and Hispanic LGBTQ people, for example, rated their trust in the police at 2.9 on a 5-point scale; white LGBTQ people rated it at 3.3, a statistically significant difference. Asians reported the highest perceptions of police legitimacy among LGBTQ people, with a 3.6 rating.

Finally, when we asked survey respondents if they would call the police for help if they became victims of a crime, we found that LGBTQ people were less likely to say yes than non-LGBTQ people: 71% compared with 87%.

But again there were meaningful differences among LGBTQ people, too. About 80% of gay and lesbian people said they would report their victimization to police, while only 69% of bisexual, 61% of transgender respondents and 60% of queer people would.

Interestingly, among LGBTQ people, Black respondents were the most likely to say they’d call the police for help, at 77%, followed by 74% of whites and Asians. Hispanics were the least likely, at 58%.

Police ‘more foe than friend’

Putting all of this together, LGBTQ people are significantly likelier to say they see the police as more foe than friend than non-LGBTQ people.

But this top-level takeaway hides important subtle differences in the data. Some members of the LGBTQ community report having had roughly similar experiences with the police as their non-LGBTQ peers, and they have similarly positive perceptions of law enforcement.

White gay men and lesbians, for example, are almost as likely as non-LGBTQ people to call the police for help. Meanwhile, LGBTQ people who are Black, poor or otherwise marginalized have a more troubled relationship with law enforcement in almost every category than their more privileged peers.

Similarly, LGBTQ people of all races fare worse by almost every measure than their non-LGBTQ peers of the same race. Even white lesbian and gay people still face significant mistreatment by police.

Our study underscores that gender and sexuality are vitally important considerations in national conversations on policing.

The LGBTQ community has won important legal rights over the past 30 years, but official violence and oppression have continued. And with more anti-LGBTQ bills emerging across the country, from laws banning gender-affirming care to those prohibiting teachers from discussing LGBTQ issues, it is little wonder that LGBTQ people remain leery of police.

“If the police are told to uphold a law, and that law goes against you fundamentally as a person,” one of our interviewees told us, “you’re not going to support the police.”The Conversation

Stefan Vogler, Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Pomo-inspired art installation completed at Xabatin Community Park

Details
Written by: Lake County News reports
Published: 14 August 2024
The Sheecome-Gathering project. Courtesy photo.

LAKEPORT, Calif. — A permanent public art installation inspired by Pomo designs is now in place in Lakeport’s Xabatin Community Park.

In January 2020, the city of Lakeport was awarded a competitive grant of $5.9 million from the California Department of Parks and Recreation funded by Proposition 68, the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018.

After years of design, engineering and construction amidst severe weather delays, the seven-acre Xabatin Community Park was opened to the public in October 2023.

A portion of the grant was reserved for public art with a call to artists to submit proposals for sculptural and/or innovative, mixed or multimedia installations to be showcased in the new lakefront park in downtown Lakeport. There were no geographic restrictions for applicants.

Proposed art works were required to be made of materials to endure the outdoors and extreme weather in a public setting, with interactive components encouraged.

The city received nine proposals that met the submission requirements, which included project dimensions, materials, applicable technical schematics and a budget.

Applicants were asked to explain how the art would contribute to promoting the city of Lakeport and Lake County as an “arts destination,” as well as any community benefit of the work, such as relating to the specific site and the past/present/future of the local community.

A jury panel of representatives from the arts community, tribal councils and city staff evaluated each proposal with specific criteria for the art work: demonstrates high level of creativity, complements existing art and culture in Lakeport, strong interactive component that encourages community engagement, overall satisfaction, and determine if a single proposal could substantiate the use of all funds in the art budget.

The panel recommended the Sheecome-Gathering project, a collaboration between Wanda Quitiquit and Lisa Kaplan.

Sheecome provides a seating area for people to connect to one another and to the site, a synergy of Indigenous Pomo cultural art and Indigenous materials, each particular to Lake County.

The installation of Sheecome is now complete and the city is excited to invite the public to experience it in the Grand Lawn area with no barriers to spectacular views of Clear Lake and Mount Konocti.

Lake County Tribal Health provided additional funding to realize the intricate technical aspects of the project.

Sheecome consists of two concrete semi-circles forming a circle, an inviting seating area or “basket” with Pomo patterns and a tile mosaic floor featuring native species central to Pomo life. The structure openings are wheelchair accessible.

Pomo artist Wanda Quitiquit. Courtesy photo.

The artists

Wanda Quitiquit is a member of the Robinson Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians, active in the tribe’s elder group and tribal government, and serves on the Tribal Advisory Committee to the Museums of Lake County. She has been a gourd artist for over 30 years, specializing in wood-burned designs derived from early Pomo basket weavers.

Lisa Kaplan, artistic/executive director of the Middletown Art Center (MAC), has initiated, produced and completed numerous community art projects and exhibits, including the original and re-imagined EcoArts Sculpture Walks at Trailside Park. Her art includes working with the many colors and qualities of Lake County earth using a mixture of earth-clay and straw (cob). Her off-site curating of exhibits has included Lakeport City Hall with shows featuring Lake County artists and students.

Both artists emphasize their engagement as community advocates committed to raising awareness of the Pomo people’s history and heritage, bringing their combined artistic talents to Xabatin Community Park with its Pomo name of “Big Water.”


A closeup of the Sheecome-Gathering project. Courtesy photo.

Judge hears arguments in lawsuit between the city of Clearlake, Highlands Mutual Water Co.

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 14 August 2024
LAKEPORT, Calif. — The city of Clearlake and Highlands Mutual Water Co. went before a judge on Tuesday to argue their sides in a lawsuit the city filed earlier this year seeking to throw out the results of an April water district shareholder election.

The short cause trial, held before Judge J. David Markham, originally was scheduled for July 26 but was rescheduled to Tuesday afternoon.

Both sides have filed extensive briefs in the matter, and the trial itself before Markham consisted of only about 15 minutes of argument and brief discussion.

On April 10, the water district board held Highlands Mutuals’ annual shareholders meeting, during which the results of the board election were tallied.

The city of Clearlake, which said it is the largest shareholder in the district, went to the meeting with a total of 177 proxy votes that staff had collected from shareholders in an effort to elect city council members as the new board.

However, the district found that the sitting board members — Mark Coats, Robert Kraft, Jessica Chernoh, Kathryn Davis and Rachelle Sapeta — were reelected with 217 votes.

In June, the city filed suit to get district records and have the election overturned, alleging that Highlands Mutual had obstructed attempts to get more information about its operations, which the city said it has a legal right to obtain under state corporation law.

The district called the lawsuit frivolous, said the city’s efforts to put in a new board in April was a hostile takeover and stated that nearly half of the proxy votes presented at that shareholder meeting were unauthorized ballots from owners of vacant lots not eligible to vote.

Highlands Mutual also filed its own lawsuit at the start of July alleging that the four Clearlake City Council members who attended the annual shareholders meeting on April 10 were participating in an illegal meeting under the Brown Act.

However, on Aug. 1, Highlands Mutual requested that case be dismissed.

City, district present arguments

In their appearance before Judge Markham on Tuesday afternoon, the attorneys for the city and the district — Brian Hamilton and Damian Moos, respectively — provided succinct arguments on the crux of the case.

Hamilton said the city is a landowner, with a number of parcels in the district, which has possibly as many as 3,000 property parcels within the city limits.

He said Highlands Mutual was founded in 1925 by landowners to provide water for their own needs. Its shareholders and landowners’ rights are the basis of the district’s existence.

Markham asked if Highlands Mutual being a mutual water company mattered. Hamilton said it did.

Hamilton said that in the lead up to the April election, the city was learning “troubling things” about how Highlands Mutual is being managed, noting city officials also were being excluded from board meetings. That was a reference to City Manager Alan Flora being escorted out and then locked out of the March 27 meeting.

He said city officials were told on April 10 that because certain shareholders were not “customers” — specifically, that they didn’t have hookups to the system — that they were not entitled to vote.

Hamilton said the district’s articles of incorporation do not say that. The district’s bylaws say a person shall be entitled to membership based on land ownership.

City representatives went to the April shareholders meeting with proxy ballots and information about people not getting notice of the election. The fact that the company has been undertaking elections without providing notice to shareholders for so long is an issue, Hamilton said.

He said the city is asking the court to require Highlands Mutual to send a notice of election to all shareholders and have a new election.

Moos told the court that he wanted to make sure they focused on what’s important, and addressed “red herrings” that he said the city had introduced into the matter.

Those included whether the district is a mutual water company, which he said was immaterial. Also not relevant, said Moos, is whether a mailing on the election went out properly, as he said there is no evidence of shareholders not receiving notice.

What the case is really all about, said Moos, is who is a shareholder in Highlands Mutual.

He said corporations code provides that a shareholder is one who is a holder of shares. The articles of incorporation don’t define who is a shareholder.

The city has been a shareholder for over 40 years and hasn’t contested that definition until now, Moos said.

In the articles of incorporation, Moos said the water company’s purpose is to sell and distribute water to shareholders.

“There is also a common sense reason to interpret it this way,” said Moos, explaining that Highlands Mutual is not a standard corporation.

Moos said the only transaction that occurs is when someone requests water service. Until then, the company has no knowledge of who owns the parcels.

He said that provides a fundamental problem with the city’s position. If they get their way, Moos argued, Highlands Mutual will have to send notices to landowners they don’t know exist.

The district’s bylaws refer to assessments. Moos said the company assesses members certain dues, as water systems don’t come for free. Without a water connection, Highlands Mutual has no knowledge of who the property owners in its boundaries are.

Those property owners without a connection have never been considered shareholders in the company’s history, and Moos argued that the city never had a problem with that until it lost the April election.

In response, Hamilton said the county recorder’s office purpose is to give notice of property conveyances. While it might create some administrative burden to have to make those notifications to property owners, he argued that Moos’ claim about the district not knowing the property owners within its bounds was itself a red herring.

Moos said the language about having a water connection has historically been a qualifier for being a shareholder in Highlands Mutual’s district.

He said if Highlands Mutual starts sending out assessments to people with no connections, it will open up new problems.

“It’s never been consistent with the interpretation of the articles of the way the parties have conducted themselves,” Moos said, adding that those being assessed in that way would start another lawsuit.

“The company can address those issues in due course,” Hamilton replied.

He added, “These hypothetical problems don't exempt the company from having to follow the law.”

Once the matter was submitted, Markham said he expected to have a ruling by the end of this week.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.
  1. New Lake County general plan update survey opens; additional outreach planned
  2. Wildfires don’t just burn farmland − they can contaminate the water farmers use to irrigate crops and support livestock
  3. Firefighters work to contain Reservoir fire
  • 581
  • 582
  • 583
  • 584
  • 585
  • 586
  • 587
  • 588
  • 589
  • 590
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page