How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page

News

Supervisors approve plans for new sheriff’s office headquarters project

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 29 August 2024
LAKEPORT, Calif. — The Board of Supervisors heard an update on the plans to convert the former Lakeport Armory into the new Lake County Sheriff’s Office headquarters and approved the remodel’s plans.

Public Services Director Lars Ewing, along with Undersheriff and Sheriff-elect Luke Bingham, presented the update during the board’s Tuesday morning meeting.

The county obtained the armory, located on seven acres at 1431 Hoyt Ave., in a land swap with the state that was completed in January of 2022.

The state gave the county the armory in exchange for a vacant 15.5-acre property at 15837 18th Ave. in Clearlake which is to be used for an affordable housing development.

On Tuesday, Patty Esposito and Jimmy Ng, architect with Dewberry, the firm hired to work on designing the project, explained aspects of it.

Esposito said that on May 2, 2023, Dewberry had a kickoff meeting with county rep and sheriff’s stakeholders to look at what the project needed to succeed.

The facility is expected to be in use up to 40 years, and will need a flexible work space to accommodate staff growth over time. The goal is to have professional and inviting spaces, with natural light and durable and timeless fixtures and finishes, all while being budget conscious, Esposito said.

She said the existing building footprint is not large enough to accommodate all departments, so the emergency operations center will remain in its current location with plans to expand at a future date.

Esposito said they added a second floor to an existing large opening that is available, which can be used for training and large events, and will be available for future growth.

Ng said the project will include repaving and restriping to address Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. There also will be a new elevator to reach the second floor.

The floorplan includes space for the agency’s many departments: the civil bureau, records, finance, criminal investigations, evidence processing and storage, a fitness room and locker rooms, enforcement and patrol departments, briefing rooms and a booking station. The second floor will have room for meetings, training and office space.

Ewing said the cost estimate for construction is $16.7 million, which includes a $1 million contingency with solar power also factored in.

The cost with furnishings, fixtures and equipment, and audio visual equipment is expected to bring the total cost to $20 million, Ewing said.

He explained that the second story will not go above the existing roof and is a mezzanine within the existing armory bay. “We needed the space for expansion.”

Leaving out the mezzanine as a shell and keeping it for future buildout is cost effective and saves $1.5 million, Ewing said.

Bingham said that if that second story is needed in 10 or 15 years, building it then would upend the sheriff's operations. Having it included now in its basic form would mean less disruption.

He said the intention is to have training classes there and to make it available to county staff in other departments.

Board Chair Bruno Sabatier asked about the current square footage in the sheriff’s office headquarters on Martin Street.

Bingham estimated that the current space is between 16,000 to 17,000 square feet, with the armory facility to be a little over 26,000 square feet with the second story.

Sabatier questioned waiting to build out the second floor. “We can only anticipate that that cost will increase as time goes on.”

He also raised issues about landscaping and having vegetation too close to the buildings. Ewing said the final plans would have to be approved by the fire marshal and Lakeport Fire Protection District.

Ewing reported that the federal American Rescue Plan Act, or ARPA, funding needed to complete the project needs to be dedicated by the end of this year.

Supervisor Jessica Pyska moved to approve the plans and specifications, which Supervisor Moke Simon seconded. The board’s vote was unanimous.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.

Division of Boating and Waterway urges safe boating this Labor Day weekend

Details
Written by: Lake County News reports
Published: 29 August 2024
California boaters enjoy a fun and safe day on the water while wearing U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jackets. Photo from the Division of Boating and Waterways.

As Labor Day weekend approaches, California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways, or DBW, is reminding boaters to prioritize safety while enjoying the state’s beautiful waterways.

This holiday weekend is a popular time for recreational boating, and DBW encourages everyone to follow best practices to ensure a safe and enjoyable experience on the water.

“Safety should always be a top priority when boating,” said Deputy Director Ramona Fernandez. “Remember to wear your life jacket, observe waterway rules, and be mindful of other boaters. Responsible boating practices help ensure everyone can enjoy their Labor Day weekend while staying safe and having fun.”

Follow these safety tips for a safe and responsible time on the water:

Wear your life jacket: Ensure you have a U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket of the appropriate size and activity type for each person onboard. Children under 13 are required to wear a properly fitted, U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket while on a moving vessel. According to the U.S. Coast Guard recreational boating statistics, in 2023, 87 percent of drowning victims were not wearing life jackets.

Get your California Boater Card: Complete an approved safe boating course and obtain your California Boater Card. California law requires boaters 60 and younger to carry a California Boater Card. Beginning Jan. 1, 2025, all operators of motorized vessels regardless of age will be required to obtain and carry one while on the water. This includes personal watercraft (PWC), vessels with trolling motors, and sailboats with motors. Visit CaliforniaBoaterCard.com for more information.

Be prepared: Before heading out on the water, check weather conditions, file a float plan, and ensure you have the proper safety equipment, including life jackets, fire extinguishers, and sound signaling device. Refer to the ABCs of California Boating for more information on required equipment and other safety tips.

Avoid alcohol: Alcohol impairs judgment and reaction times. In California, it is against the law to operate a boat or water ski with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 percent or higher. Officers may also arrest boaters with a BAC of less than 0.08 percent if conditions are deemed unsafe. BUI convictions can result in up to six months in jail and/or fines of up to $1,000. Two convictions within seven years could add a jail term of up to one year. Boaters caught operating under the influence may also have their voyage terminated and their vessel impounded.

Observe waterway rules: Follow all posted signage and be aware of local regulations and boating rules.

Practice responsible boating: Maintain a safe speed, be aware of your surroundings, and respect other boaters.

Help keep our waterways clean: Implement clean and green boating practices such as always carrying oil absorbents on board and bringing everything back that you took out on the water including food, garbage, and fishing line.

For more information on safe and responsible boating practices, please visit the California State Parks Division of Boating and Waterways website at www.dbw.parks.ca.gov.

Biden administration’s negotiated price cuts for 10 common prescription drugs likely to save Medicare billions, beginning in 2026

Details
Written by: Simon F. Haeder, Texas A&M University
Published: 29 August 2024

 

The Biden administration announced on Aug. 16, 2024, the reduced prices of the first 10 drugs it has negotiated with pharmaceutical companies over their Medicare prices.

Provisions authorizing these negotiations were part of the Inflation Reduction Act, which took effect in 2022, but these lower prices aren’t scheduled to take effect until 2026.

The drugs are purchased through Medicare Part D, a prescription drug coverage program for Americans who are 65 and older. The 10 medications were used by 9 million patients with Medicare coverage in 2023, and they accounted for US$56.2 billion in total Medicare spending. Had the negotiated prices been in place that year, the government estimates that Medicare would have saved about $6 billion.

To put this in perspective: Total annual spending on prescription drugs in the U.S. exceeds $405 billion, and Part D alone spends more than $215 billion.

As a scholar who researches the politics of health policy, I remain skeptical that negotiations will end up having a substantial impact on the U.S. health care system in the foreseeable future, even if the law survives ongoing legal and implementation challenges.

At the same time, I do expect that many older adults will reap substantial savings on their out-of-pocket spending on prescription drugs over the coming years. But that will primarily happen due to other Inflation Reduction Act provisions.

Cutting drug costs for Medicare enrollees

The Inflation Reduction Act allows the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to negotiate prices with the companies that make some of the most expensive drugs in the Medicare program, including life-saving cancer and diabetes treatments like Imbruvica and Januvia.

Democrats have hailed these drug pricing provisions as game-changing. Vice President Kamala Harris, who is now running for president, is making efforts to rein in drug prices part of her election campaign.

Former President Donald Trump, however, has been relatively quiet on the issue. Public opinion polls show overwhelming public support for the policy.

Medicare will soon begin to negotiate prices for more drugs, including 30 over the next two years.

If the policy continues to move forward as planned, the drug price negotiation provision is expected to save the U.S. government about $98.5 billion by 2031.

The Biden administration hopes that some of these cost savings will be passed down to Americans 65 and older through reduced Medicare Part D premiums and lower out-of-pocket costs. The White House also hopes to reduce the federal deficit by $237 billion.

Other important benefits for older adults

While negotiations over Medicare drug prices have received the most attention, the Inflation Reduction Act included other provisions that might be even more beneficial for older adults.

These include limiting out-of-pocket spending by older adults on prescription drugs to no more than $2,000 annually by 2025, limiting the growth of Medicare Part D premiums, providing rebates if certain drug price increases outpace inflation, eliminating out-of-pocket costs for vaccines and providing premium subsidies to low-income people 65 and up.

A Black female pharmacist shows Black woman some prescription medications.
Government negotiations with pharmaceutical companies over drug pricing should lower medical costs for many people 65 and older. Marko Geber/DigitalVision via Getty Images

Strong industry resistance, but companies negotiated

Despite their vocal opposition and their ongoing public relations campaign that has attacked this process, all affected U.S. drugmakers decided to engage in the price negotiations.

The daunting alternatives, including paying a penalty that could run as high as 95% of their U.S. pharmaceutical product sales, and a requirement to pull their drugs from the Medicare and Medicaid markets, proved to be strong incentives.

However, the manufacturers of medications have been fighting the measure in court. And despite several losses, this battle will likely continue for the foreseeable future, with uncertain outcomes.

Why US drug prices are so high

Americans pay substantially more for prescription drugs compared with people who live in countries with similar economies. For example, per capita pharmaceutical spending in the U.S. amounted to $1,432 compared to $1,042 in Germany and $766 in France in 2022.

The reasons for this disparity are multilayered and include the overall complexity of the U.S. health care system and the lack of transparency in the drug supply chain. Of course, many other countries also directly set prices for drugs or use their monopoly over health services to drive down costs.

Drug costs impose a big burden on Americans. People who are 65 and older are particularly affected, with 1 in 5 not taking all of their medications as prescribed due to high costs.

Older adult customer standing at a pharmacy checkout stand, with pharmacist explaining something.
The first 10 drugs selected for negotiated pricing can be picked up at a pharmacy. Maskot/Getty Images

Weighing the prospects of price negotiations

In my view, the government’s efforts are a step in the right direction. The potential for real savings for Americans 65 and older will undoubtedly grow as more drug prices are negotiated.

Yet, some real concerns remain.

Even if the negotiated lower prices survive the industry’s legal challenges, it’s possible that future Republican administrations won’t embrace this policy, as Republicans have historically opposed price negotiations for Medicare.

The true effect for patients with Medicare will likely be much smaller than it appears. That’s because the Medicare program and patients often already receive discounts on many of these drugs. These discounts will now be eliminated.

In addition, the pharmaceutical industry has a history of skillfully exploiting loopholes that may further limit the financial impact. Manufacturers have already told shareholders that they expect limited impacts on their profits.

It’s also too soon to tell if this is going to be a win for all Americans. It’s possible that Americans who aren’t covered by Medicare may actually see prices go up, even on these same drugs. Working Americans could thus wind up shouldering ever larger burdens to deliver this support for older adults.

This article includes passages that were included in a previous article published on Aug. 30, 2023.The Conversation

Simon F. Haeder, Associate Professor of Public Health, Texas A&M University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

New research finds shrinking prime age worker population being filled by older workers

Details
Written by: Lake County News reports
Published: 29 August 2024
A new research report published by the Employee Benefit Research Institute, or EBRI, taking a historical look at labor force participation and employment data in the United States found the prime working age population (25-64 years old) has significantly fallen and is being filled by older workers.

At the same time, the labor force participation rate of those ages 65 or older has not reached its pre-pandemic level, while that of the prime working age population has reached that level.

The report, “Trends in Labor Force Participation and Employment of Americans Ages 16 or Older,” examines the U.S. civilian labor force through December 2023, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey.

As the Baby Boom generation has aged, the American labor force has also grown older. The new research evaluates several labor force questions relating to the civilian noninstitutionalized American population, including the labor force participation rates by age and gender, shares of the U.S. population and the U.S. civilian labor force by age and gender. This study examines these trends as far back as 1975.

Key findings in the report include:

• The share of the labor force that is of prime working ages (ages 25–64) has significantly fallen since the mid-1990s despite the labor force participation rates of individuals of these ages remaining near mid-1990s levels. The decrease is being driven by the smaller number of people of these ages (meaning that younger and older Americans are needed to cover this decrease). So far, the older population has been filling the gap in the labor force, as those younger than age 25 are at near record-low levels for their share of the labor force.

• Beginning 2008, the U.S. population (ages 16 or older) became increasingly composed of those ages 65 or older. By 2023, this age category made up the largest share of the population. Americans ages 16-24 made up the smallest proportion of this population, while those ages 45-54 made up the second smallest share.

• When analyzing the U.S. population ages 16 or older by age and gender, females ages 65 or older made up the largest proportion by a sizable margin. However, males of the same ages tended to make up a comparatively larger share of the labor force than females, with the labor force gaps being smallest among the youngest and oldest age ranges.

• The labor force participation rates of those ages 16 or older were overall relatively constant from 1975-2023. However, participation rates rose for females and fell for males, though both genders had lower participation rates in 2023 than in 2008.

• Labor force participation rates of White Americans ages 16 and older declined from 2000-2023, with the rates for Black and Hispanic Americans also being lower in 2023 than in 2000. However, the labor force participation rates for Black and Hispanic Americans increased sharply from 2021–2023 after falling in 2020, while this was not the case for White Americans.

“Despite the difference in labor force participation (LFP) rates between 1975 and 2023 being less than 2 percentage points, significant changes in labor force patterns and composition have occurred over the past several decades. The LFP rates decreased for men and increased for women over this timespan, though female LFP rates have trended down since the 1990s, resulting in a lower overall LFP in recent years. A large decline in the LFP rate was observed among those ages 16-19 at the beginning of the 2000s, while those ages 65 and over have had an increase in the LFP rate,” explained Craig Copeland, director, Wealth Benefits Research, EBRI.

“The age of the labor force will play an important role in companies’ workforce development. At present, the aging of the Baby Boom generation has resulted in an increased share of older individuals in the labor force,” Copeland continued. “However, members of this generation are almost all at least in their 60s, and the next generation, Gen X, is much smaller. So, a decrease in the share of workers ages 55 or older is imminent. How quickly this outcome results will be determined by whether the Baby Boom generation has continual higher labor force participation rates at ages over 65 than what has occurred in the past.”

The Employee Benefit Research Institute is a non-profit, independent and unbiased resource organization that provides the most authoritative and objective information about critical issues relating to employee benefit programs in the United States. The organization also coordinates activities for the Center for Research on Health Benefits Innovation, Financial Wellbeing Research Center, Retirement Security Research Center and produces a variety of leading industry surveys during the year. For more information, visit www.ebri.org.
  1. Community members share ideas for new Clearlake Oaks park
  2. Lakeport Police Department to increase patrols during Labor Day weekend
  3. Caltrans charges ahead on powering a West Coast zero-emission truck corridor with $102 million in federal funds
  • 565
  • 566
  • 567
  • 568
  • 569
  • 570
  • 571
  • 572
  • 573
  • 574
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page