How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page

News

'I thought I could wait this out': Fearing coronavirus, patients are delaying hospital visits, putting health and lives at risk

Details
Written by: Arif R. Sarwari, West Virginia University and Christopher Goode, West Virginia University
Published: 15 May 2020

 

Emergency rooms across the country are seeing sharp drops in the number of patients seeking care for problems other than COVID-19. AAron Ontiveroz/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

“Where have all the patients gone?” That’s what doctors in our West Virginia University hospitals began asking as the coronavirus pandemic spread.

We were prepared for a rise in COVID-19 patients, but we didn’t expect the sharp decline we saw in everyday cases. Our emergency department visits fell by half in early April, a time when we would normally see growth as flu season overlaps with an increase in trauma as the weather improves. Inpatient stays fell by nearly two-thirds during the same time period.

Did the population of a state that ranks in the bottom of most health indicators suddenly get better? Did their lung disease, heart disease and vascular disease improve?

In the emergency room, we heard the real reason: “I thought I could wait this out,” patients told us.

In hospitals across the U.S. and Europe, people fearing contracting COVID-19 have been choosing not to seek the emergency treatment they need. One survey conducted in April found that nearly a third of U.S. adults had delayed medical care or avoided seeking care because they were concerned about getting COVID-19.

A study in Spain found a 40% drop in the number of patients undergoing emergency cardiac catherization for a dangerous type of heart attack known as STEMI between the late February and mid-March. A similar study in the U.S. found a 38% drop in heart catherization for STEMI cases from January to March. Children’s vaccinations also dropped off significantly, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, raising new concerns after last year’s measles outbreak.

This has certainly been our experience as physicians and faculty at the West Virginia University School of Medicine. The patients we saw in the emergency room in April were a lot sicker, and the proportion of emergency room patients who needed hospitalization increased.

The costs of delaying emergency care

Delaying treatment for acute and chronic conditions comes at a cost, both human and financial.

A patient with appendicitis who gets treatment early will usually undergo laparoscopic surgery, using small incisions and a camera, and can go home two days later. If the same patient waits too long, however, and a pocket of infection known as an abscess forms, that means more complex surgery. We will have to insert a tube for several days to drain the abscess, and the patient will be hospitalized longer, in addition to going on antibiotics. In the worst case, the appendix could burst and lead to diffuse peritonitis and sepsis, a medical emergency with severe abdominal pain and low blood pressure.

Similarly, if a diabetic with a foot infection that is early in the stages of cellulitis, a painful localized skin infection, waits a week to two longer than usual, there’s a greater chance the infection has reached the bone, becoming an osteomyelitis that could require amputation.

The ultimate cost for delaying treatment can be loss of life. Data from the CDC shows the U.S. had 66,000 more deaths than expected from January through the end of April, with only about half of those linked to COVID-19.

In some cases, clinics are trying to balance the risks. For example, many clinics have delayed preventative care such as cancer screenings because of the risk of COVID-19. One U.S. study found an abrupt drop in preventative cancer screenings of between 86% and 94% through April. Treatments for cancer patients are continuing, with hospitals taking extra precautions to protect patients while their immune systems are compromised.

The hospital experience is changing

COVID-19 is not going away anytime soon, nor will heart attacks, strokes or appendicitis.

If you feel you need to see your doctor, go. If you feel you need to go to the emergency department, call 911. It’s better than the pain and costs that can come with delay.

Your experiences during hospital visits going forward will definitely be different for a while. People arriving for hospital care that doesn’t require staying overnight should expect some kind of screening process to make sure that they are not ill with COVID-19. The health care system will encourage social distancing at check-ins, as well as in the waiting rooms, and everyone will be wearing face masks.

As a patient, you might not be allowed to have visitors, but you will receive the health care that you need.

While these certainly unprecedented times have upended our care processes, they also offer patients and health care systems new opportunities.

When we talk to our patients, many of them appreciate the opportunity for virtual visits, especially those at highest risk for complications from COVID-19 infection. The ability to establish virtual urgent care as well as offer many clinical services through virtual visits is here to stay.

The past few weeks have seen very significant changes at all points of patient entry into a hospital or clinic. However, clinical medicine’s fundamental principle of primum non nocere, “first do no harm,” prevails, and we remain committed to making sure that patients that need care get it on time and do not have to delay their visits or ignore their symptoms.

[You need to understand the coronavirus pandemic, and we can help. Read The Conversation’s newsletter.]The Conversation

Arif R. Sarwari, Physician, associate professor of infectious diseases, chair of Department of Medicine, West Virginia University and Christopher Goode, Emergency medicine physician, chair of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

State announces additional counties moving deeper into Stage 2 recovery; Lake yet to apply for variance

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 14 May 2020
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA – Nearly 20 California counties have been cleared to move into an accelerated process for reopening from the closures forced under the COVID-19 pandemic.

On Friday California officially moved into Stage 2 of Gov. Gavin Newsom’s roadmap to modify the statewide stay-at-home order.

State officials are allowing counties to apply for variances to move more quickly through the process as long as they can attest to a number of requirements, including having no new cases and deaths to testing and hospital capacity, being able to protect essential workers, and the ability to shelter a portion of the homeless population.

On Tuesday, Lake County Public Health Officer Dr. Gary Pace said he intended to bring his plans for a variance to the Board of Supervisors at its meeting next week in order to submit the plan to the state, as Lake County News has reported.

The California Department of Public Health reported on Tuesday that variances for Butte and El Dorado counties were approved.

By Wednesday night, CDPH said 16 more counties had their variances approved.

Those counties are Amador, Calaveras, Colusa, Glenn, Lassen, Mariposa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, San Benito, Shasta, Sierra, Tehama, Tuolumne and Yuba-Sutter.

CDPH said the counties have attested that they meet the criteria necessary to move further into Stage 2.

That allows them to reopen various parts of the economy with modifications implemented to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

State officials said the goal is to reopen California in a way that minimizes the risk for transmitting COVID-19 to the extent possible.

That goal includes limiting nonessential movement and mixing of populations, especially within jurisdictions with higher confirmed cases, and delaying the opening of environments in which there is prolonged and close contact as part of the way business must operate.

Statewide guidance for these sectors is available here.

CDPH said its website will continue to be updated in real-time when attestation forms for additional counties are approved.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.

County cancels spring tax-defaulted land sale; new sale planned for fall

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 14 May 2020
LAKE COUNTY, Calif. – The county’s planned tax-defaulted land sale set for later this month has been canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

On Tuesday, Lake County Treasurer-Tax Collector Barbara Ringen updated the Board of Supervisors on the sale, reporting its cancellation and plans to reschedule.

Ringen’s written report to the board said that in a March 30 letter the State Controller’s Office had “strongly recommended” to county tax collectors that such tax sales be canceled or postponed until the governor provided further guidance.

While such land sales take place under statutory requirements, Ringen’s report said the governor can suspend statutory provisions as necessary. At the same time, Gov. Gavin Newsom “has moved to protect citizens from being displaced due to their financial situation related to the COVID-19 crisis.”

“Tax Defaulted Land Sale 157 is cancelled due to the Governor's executive order,” Ringen said in her written report.

That also was her message to the board during its meeting on Tuesday.

Ringen said she is planning to reschedule the sale for October. Once she has a date set, she said she will come back to the board for approval.

Ringen’s previous reports to the board stated that 240 properties were to be auctioned off.

In addition to a new date in October, Ringen said she is looking at conducting another tax sale in March 2021.

The county has thousands of properties in tax default, totaling millions of dollars in uncollected revenue.

The city of Clearlake and the county have been at loggerheads over the tax sales, which have not happened as frequently under Ringen’s tenure, a fact she has attributed to issues including staffing.

Earlier this year, the city threatened the county with legal action if Ringen’s office didn’t make additional efforts to hold more sales.

Those issues didn’t arise directly during Tuesday’s board meeting, although Ringen told the board that her office is working to reduce the number of parcels that are in tax default. She said she doesn’t know if they will be able to catch up any time soon.

Supervisor Tina Scott asked Ringen how many properties have been redeemed ahead of the tax sale.

Ringen estimated 25 to 30 properties had been redeemed, noting the majority of redemptions happen in the 30 days before a sale. She said that the county has so far collected $350,000 in delinquent taxes in relation to parcels listed in the recent sale.

She also reported that her department will be closely tracking properties impacted by COVID-19.

Last month, the board approved a process for waiving late fees and penalties for property owners who cannot pay on time due to impacts of the pandemic, as Lake County News has reported.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.

Report: California population up, Lake County numbers drop to 13-year low

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 14 May 2020
LAKE COUNTY, Calif. – Over the past year, California has seen a growth in its number of residents while Lake County’s population has shown a minor decline that puts it at a 13-year low.

The California Department of Finance’s latest population report, released this month, contains preliminary year over year January 2020 and revised January 2019 population data for California cities, counties and the state.

The agency said the estimates are based on information through Jan. 1 and do not include adjustments for potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report said California added 87,494 residents to bring the state’s estimated total population to 39,782,870 people as of Jan. 1.

California’s population grew by only 0.2 percent, continuing a historically slow growth trend
since the Great Recession, the report said.

Lake County’s population dropped by 0.4 percent over the past year, going from 64,268 residents in January 2019 to the January 2020 estimate of 64,040.

The 64,040 residents reported in January is the lowest population estimate recorded for Lake County since 2007. The county’s highest population in that time was 65,131 in 2014.

The city of Clearlake had the largest overall reduction in the past year, -0.5 percent, from 14,363 to 14,297, followed by the city of Lakeport, -0.4, 4,698 to 4,677. For the balance of the county, the reduction was -0.3, dropping from 45,207 to 45,066.

Lake is among the rural counties impacted by wildfires that experienced population loss, according to the report.

Neighboring counties showed the following numbers:

– Colusa: -0.4, year-over change, 21,990 to 21,902.
– Glenn: 2.5, year-over change, 28,695 to 29,400.
– Mendocino: -0.5, year-over change, 88,388 to 87,946.
– Napa: -0.6, year-over change, 139,970 to 139,088.
– Sonoma: -0.8, year-over change, 496,947 to 492,980.
– Yolo: 0.4, year-over change, 220,896 to 221,705.

Over the past year, 256 cities gained population, 225 lost population and one had no change, the report said.

The report shows that growth has remained strong over the past year in the Central Valley’s interior counties and the Inland Empire. At the same time, growth has continued but remained modest in the Bay Area, and slowing to near zero and even negative in most of the coastal counties.

The report showed that seven counties had growth rates over 1.0 percent: Glenn, 2.5 percent; Yuba, 2 percent; Placer, 2 percent; El Dorado, 1.7 percent; San Benito, 1.4 percent, which was the notable Bay Area exception gaining over 1 percent due to increased housing construction; San Joaquin, 1.1 percent; and Kern, 1 percent.

California's statewide housing growth, as measured by net unit growth in completed housing
units for 2019, was 94,662 units making 2019 the first time the state has added more housing units than people. Total housing in California reached 14,329,863 units, a 0.7 -percent increase, according to the report.

Of the 14,329,863 housing units in California, the report said 9,228,303 are single-family and 4,540,850 are multi-family with 560,817 mobile homes. Multi-family housing growth outpaced single-family housing by almost 8,695 net units – meaning, new construction minus demolition – continuing an eight-year trend.

The California Department of Finance produces the population estimates annually as part of calculating its annual appropriations limit.

The State Controller’s Office uses the Department of Finance's estimates to update its population figures for distribution of state subventions to cities and counties, and to comply with various state codes.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.
  1. Redwood Empire Food Bank is calling on the community for help
  2. Public Health officials preparing plan to accelerate Lake County’s reopening
  3. McGuire, Aguiar-Curry and Lake County work together to secure COVID-19 testing site
  • 2336
  • 2337
  • 2338
  • 2339
  • 2340
  • 2341
  • 2342
  • 2343
  • 2344
  • 2345
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page