How to resolve AdBlock issue? 
News
- Details
- Written by: Lake County News reports
“Providing attractants for deer – food, salt licks or even water – is against the law for good reason,” said Dr. Brandon Munk, senior wildlife veterinarian with CDFW’s Wildlife Investigations Laboratory. “Because these artificial attractants can congregate animals and promote the spread of disease, it’s particularly imperative to leave wildlife alone during an outbreak. There is no cure or vaccine for this disease, so our best management strategies right now are to track it carefully, and to take preventative measures to limit the spread.”
Beginning in May, CDFW began receiving increased reports of mortality in deer, both free-ranging and at fawn rehabilitation facilities.
With the assistance of wildlife rehabilitation facilities and the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, CDFW confirmed cervid adenovirus 1 (CdAdV-1) as the cause of hemorrhagic disease outbreaks in Napa, Santa Clara, Sonoma, Tehama and Yolo counties.
The disease is typically fatal to deer and can be spread by animals in close contact with each other.
The virus is not known to affect people, pets or domestic livestock.
CdAdV-1 was the cause of a 1993-1994 outbreak of hemorrhagic disease in black-tailed deer and mule deer that spanned at least 18 California counties.
Since then, CdAdV-1 has been identified as the cause of sporadic, often widespread, outbreaks of hemorrhagic disease in California and other western states.
Deer fawns are at greatest risk, with high rates of mortality following infection. Yearlings and adult deer are more resistant but mortalities in these age groups occur as well. Outbreaks can be widespread and have significant impact on affected deer populations.
Affected deer are often found dead without any obvious symptoms. They may be found near water. Sick animals may have excessive salivation (drooling or foaming at the mouth), diarrhea, regurgitation or seizures.
In addition to removing food and other attractants, Californians can help wildlife veterinarians track and study the disease by reporting sightings of sick or dead deer.
Anyone who observes a deer exhibiting symptoms, or encountering a deer that has died from unknown causes, can submit the information to CDFW through the department’s online mortality reporting system.
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
In a brief statement, Pace said the patient “died with a COVID-19-related illness.”
He said the individual was over age 60, had underlying medical conditions and was sick for a few weeks prior to dying.
“To protect the privacy of this person and their family, we will not be giving out any further information at this time,” Pace said.
Pace did, however, offer an explanation at Lake County News’ request about how the cause of death is determined.
“I can say that generally, a person is not identified as having COVID without them having a positive test. An attending doctor will determine presumed cause of death, not public health. Cause of death is usually decided based on a combination of determinations, including factoring in their underlying conditions, progression of the symptoms, and recent test results (like COVID results),” he said in an email.
He said decisions about autopsy are “generally made by the medical examiner if there is a pressing question about the progression not following an expected course given these factors.”
Pace added, “Usually, if the course of the illness leading to death follows a trajectory consistent with the presumed cause of death, no autopsy is needed.”
The county’s first COVID-19-related death was reported at the start of July.
On Wednesday, Public Health reported that Lake County’s COVID-19 caseload was up to 212. Of those, 22 are active, 189 are recovered and one patient is hospitalized.
Statewide, county Public Health departments are reporting close to 530,000 cases and more than 9,800 deaths.
Regarding this second death in Lake County attributed to the coronavirus, Pace said, “This is a tragic reminder that all Lake County residents must take precautions that can slow the spread of this virus.”
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
The council will meet virtually at 6 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 6.
Because of the county’s shelter in place order, Clearlake City Hall remains closed to the public, however, the virtual meeting will be broadcast live on Lake County PEG TV’s YouTube Channel.
The agenda can be found here.
Comments and questions can be submitted in writing for City Council consideration by sending them to Deputy City Clerk Tina Viramontes at
To give the council adequate time to review your questions and comments, please submit your written comments prior to 4 p.m. on Thursday, Aug. 6.
Each public comment emailed to the city clerk will be read aloud by the mayor or a member of staff for up to three minutes or will be displayed on a screen. Public comment emails and town hall public comment submissions that are received after the beginning of the meeting will not be included in the record.
At 5:30 p.m., the council will meet in closed session to discuss existing litigation against Pacific Gas and Electric Corp. and two potential cases of litigation.
On the agenda for the open portion of the meeting is a discussion regarding raising council members' salaries.
A report to the council from City Manager Alan Flora and City Attorney Ryan Jones said at a recent meeting the council requested staff bring back a discussion related to the council’s compensation.
Their report said the current monthly council salaries are $300 per member, the maximum salary allowed under state government code for cities with a population of less than 35,000 people. However, state law also allows the council to increase the salary above that amount by 5 percent per calendar year since the last adjustment of salary.
They added that amounts paid for retirement, health and welfare, and federal Social Security benefits are not included in the computation of the maximum salary.
Flora and Jones reported that the salary for Clearlake City Council members was last amended by city ordinance in 1989. They said the council may amend the Municipal Code and increase the current salary by $465, to a total of $765 per month under Government Code section 36516(a)(4).
The city’s current total cost for council salaries is $18,000, plus health care benefits, the costs for which vary depending on the plan of the individual council member but average between $30,000 and $40,000 per year.
“If the maximum increase mentioned above was implemented of $765 per month the stipend costs would increase from $18,000 to $45,900 or from $3,600 to $9,180 per year for each council member,” they wrote. Those increased costs would be covered by the general fund.
They said the Government Code also restricts the council's ability to change the salary during the council member’s term of office. “Under Government Code section 36516.5, a change to the
compensation of all city council members is permissible when one or more of the members of
2 council begins a new term of office. Any increase to the City Council’s salary could be effective following the November 2020 election.”
Flora and Jones’ report includes a 2018 League of California Cities council compensation survey as well as information about nearby cities. The information showed that Lakeport City Council members receive $300 a month, Cloverdale council members receive $550 a month and Ukiah council members receive $490 a month.
Also under council business, the council will discuss potential direction to staff regarding a tobacco retail license program.
City Clerk Melissa Swanson’s report to the council explains that staff wants to know the council’s thoughts on the matter and whether they should continue to pursue such a program’s implementation in light of the funding limitations.
On the meeting's consent agenda – items that are not considered controversial and are usually adopted on a single vote – are warrant registers; consideration of continuation of declaration of local emergency issued on Oct. 9, 2017, and ratified by council action Oct. 12, 2017, in response to the Sulphur fire; consideration of continuation of declaration of local emergency issued on March 14, 2020, and Ratified by Council Action March 19, 2020; and ratification of a letter of support for the National Endowment of the Arts “Our Town” grant.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Supervisor EJ Crandell, who had asked that the ordinance be placed on the agenda originally, requested early on in Tuesday’s meeting that the discussion item be pulled, noting there was confusion on the matter.
Last week, the county had initially posted the draft urgency ordinance – which includes fines for failing to comply with health orders, including masking requirements in public – but not a second, nonurgency draft ordinance without fines and penalties that was being proposed by the Blue Collar Committee, a group of local business owners assembled by Supervisor Rob Brown. The Blue Collar Committee’s version was later posted.
Crandell said Tuesday that there was confusion about the ordinances and that it had been his intention for the board to consider both, not just the urgency version. He was concerned that people hadn’t had enough time to read both documents.
Board members agreed to hold off on the item but Supervisor Tina Scott said she considered the matter urgent and wanted it to be brought back at next week’s meeting.
Several community members showed up online and in-person to discuss the item, with their comments noting they were disappointed to have the matter delayed.
Haji Warf told the board that freedom is not just about rights but also responsibilities and that masking helps protect the community’s high-risk residents.
Lake County Chamber of Commerce Chief Executive Officer Melissa Fulton asked for clarification as to whether the board would eventually consider one or both ordinances. Crandell said it would be both.
Supervisor Bruno Sabatier said he had no issue with moving forward and having the conversation as scheduled since the documents had been posted with enough time to meet the meeting requirements.
Crandell, however, said he believed people hadn’t had enough time to look at the documents.
County Counsel Anita Grant added that, since at the start of the meeting it was announced that the item was going to be pulled, going forward with the discussion would add to the confusion.
In June the board had considered another urgency ordinance that would have enforced health orders with fines and penalties. That ordinance failed as it required at least four supervisors to vote in its favor.
Email Elizabeth Larson at