How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page

News

What’s a ‘black box’ warning? A pharmacologist explains how these labels protect patients

Details
Written by: C. Michael White, University of Connecticut
Published: 15 November 2025

Black box warnings can influence whether or not clinicians decide to prescribe a drug. SDI Productions/E+ via Getty Images

A “black box” warning on a health product sounds pretty scary – maybe even more so when it’s suddenly being taken off the packaging.

Americans were reminded of this type of public health messaging on Nov. 10, 2025, when the Food and Drug Administration announced it is removing the “black box” warning from hormone replacement therapy for menopause.

But what are these warnings, anyway? What’s their history, and how do they affect a drug’s use?

I am a clinical pharmacologist and pharmacist studying drug prescribing, safety and effectiveness for over 25 years.

Black box warnings – or as the FDA officially calls them, boxed warnings – are a tool for alerting pharmacists and clinicians that the medication may have serious risks. These health care professionals are then expected to communicate those risks to consumers.

An official source of drug information

Black box warnings for particular medications appear on the product package inserts that the FDA requires pharmaceutical companies to create for each prescription drug.

Product package inserts provide official information about the drug to health care professionals. These pamphlets are attached to bulk containers of drugs purchased by pharmacies so that the pharmacist has the most updated official information on the product. The package inserts are also published in textbooks such as the Physician’s Desk Reference and on websites maintained by drug manufacturers.

The requirement for product package inserts came out of a consumer protection law passed in 1966, called the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act, which aimed to prevent unfair or deceptive packaging in products used by consumers.

The package insert carries a set of official information about the drug, provided by the manufacturer and regulated by the FDA. The insert must include who the drug is approved for, proper dosing and administration, and a description of the key clinical trial results that showed it was effective and safe.

It must also disclose any health risks that the drug poses – such as a boxed warning.

Flagging safety risks

The FDA has two categories for the health risks that medications could pose: precautions and warnings. Both are listed on the package insert.

Precautions warn clinicians of possible harm that could result in minor or moderate injury to patients. Warnings, on the other hand, alert them to the potential risk of dangerous adverse events that could result in serious injury or death. The most serious warnings for a drug are called boxed warnings. The text of those warnings is enclosed by a black box on the insert so they will not be missed by clinicians.

According to a 2022 study, more than 400 medications currently carry black box warnings.

The FDA announced it was removing the black box warning from hormone therapy for menopause.

Antidepressants are one example. While such drugs can lessen the severity of depression symptoms, researchers have found that during the first few weeks of taking them, patients have an increased risk of suicide – particularly children and young adults. The FDA first issued a black box warning about the drugs’ use in children and adolescents in 2004 and expanded the warning to young adults in 2007.

Another example is clozapine, a drug used to suppress delusions experienced by people with schizophrenia. Although the drug is very effective, the FDA first gave it a black box warning when it was reintroduced to the market in 1989 because it can stop the production of white blood cells, potentially leading to life-threatening infections.

Hormone replacement therapy for menopause got its black box warning in 2003 after a clinical trial called the Women’s Health Initiative pointed to an increased risk of breast cancer without a reduced risk of heart disease in women who used it.

In subsequent years, reanalyses of the Women’s Health Initiative results, as well as data from other studies, have shown that the therapy is safe in women ages 50 to 60. Newer, safer formulations of estrogen and progestin have also emerged. These factors prompted the FDA to remove the warnings in November 2025, saying the therapy doesn’t pose significant risks.

Medical and legal realities

Black box warnings can influence clinicians’ choice of whether or not to prescribe a particular drug. For example, since other drugs for schizophrenia do not carry the serious risks that clozapine does, clinicians usually reserve that medicine for people who could not use those other drugs.

The black box warnings can also play a role in malpractice cases. In some states, package inserts and any warnings they contain can be used to establish a standard of care, leaving clinicians who deviate from them liable for damages. In other states, the warnings they list can be used to support findings of negligence.

For instance, the black box warning on the insert of the drug thalidomide states it can cause birth defects. It instructs clinicians to obtain a a negative pregnancy test before use and ensure the patient is not able to get pregnant or is taking precautions to avoid pregnancy before prescribing. Failure to do so could make the clinician liable if the person taking the drug bears a child with birth defects.

Product package inserts are living documents. As new information becomes available, the FDA may find a medication’s risk is untenable and request the drug be removed from the market. Or it may decide to remove the boxed warning from the drug if new data shows the drug is less dangerous than previously thought.The Conversation

C. Michael White, Distinguished Professor of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

City of Lakeport seeks Business Walk surveys

Details
Written by: LAKE COUNTY NEWS REPORTS
Published: 15 November 2025

LAKEPORT, Calif. — Business owners and managers in the city of Lakeport are encouraged to complete a Business Walk survey distributed in recent weeks.

Teams of city staff and volunteers have been conducting in-person site visits throughout Lakeport during the annual Business Walk. 

Access the online survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/RCLZCN3. 

The city wants to hear about concerns or issues facing the business community.

The Business Walk program demonstrates the city’s commitment to supporting businesses while gaining information about challenges and barriers to their success.  

Findings from the visits are compiled and presented to council for information and any required action.

This year’s teams included representatives from city staff, Lakeport Police Department, Lakeport Economic Development Advisory Committee, Lake County Economic Development Corp., Lake County Chamber of Commerce, California Employment Development, the Clear Lake Environmental Research Center and Community Development Services.

Lakeport Economic Development Advisory Committee, or LEDAC, is an advocate for a strong and positive business community and serves as a conduit for communicating the goals, activities and progress of Lakeport’s economic and business programs.  

The all-volunteer group meets monthly on the second Wednesday at 7:30 a.m. in Lakeport City Hall, 225 Park St. All meetings are open to the public.

Space News: Space debris struck a Chinese spacecraft – how the incident could be a wake-up call for international collaboration

Details
Written by: R. Lincoln Hines, Georgia Institute of Technology
Published: 15 November 2025

China’s Shenzhou-20 spacecraft – shown here hitching a ride on a Long March-2F carrier rocket – was hit by a piece of space debris. Pedro Pardo/AFP via Getty Images

China’s Shenzhou-20 spacecraft took a hit from a piece of space debris floating through orbit, causing Chinese officials to delay the spacecraft’s return from its Tiangong space station in early November 2025.

In addition to stranding the three Chinese astronauts – called taikonauts – who were set to return to Earth, this incident highlights the increasing risks posed to China and the broader international community by the growing amount of space debris.

I study China’s space program. My research suggests that national pride plays an important role in China’s growing space ambitions. As China continues to invest in expensive space capabilities, it will also likely become increasingly sensitive to losing them. The rise in space debris may create incentives for Chinese officials to cooperate with the United States on measures that reduce the risk of collisions.

Space debris – a growing issue

Space debris is creating growing problems for space operations. It includes any artificial objects in orbit not operating as satellites or spacecraft. It ranges in size from a fleck of paint to large rocket bodies roughly the size of a school bus.

In the most commonly used orbit – low Earth orbit – this debris can move at speeds of roughly 18,000 mph, almost seven times the speed of a bullet. At such high speeds, even tiny pieces of space debris can be highly destructive, to the point that this debris might continue to multiply until one day it makes certain critical orbits unusable. When space debris collides with other objects and fragments, they can break into smaller pieces, generating even more debris.

It’s somewhat ironic that China’s spacecraft took a hit from space junk. The country is responsible for creating the majority of space debris. In 2007, China blew up a defunct Fengyun-1c weather satellite to test an anti-satellite weapon. It generated the most space debris in history – over 3,000 pieces are still orbiting today.

This short clip shows the increase in space debris in orbit around Earth.

On several occasions, the International Space Station has had to maneuver to narrowly avoid being struck by debris from this test, including as recently as 2021.

Anti-satellite weapons

Why would China, or any other country, want to develop an anti-satellite weapon? Satellites provide significant benefits to militaries. They help with reconnaissance and intelligence, allow for the precise targeting and guidance of long-range munitions, support communication over large distances and supply weather data, to name just a few uses.

These advantages were showcased during the first Gulf War, often called the “first space war.” The United States used space technologies to quickly and decisively defeat the Iraqi military within weeks, and with far fewer casualties than expected. The Gulf War had a profound impact on Chinese military thinking, with analysts in the People’s Liberation Army recognizing the importance of space technologies in modern warfare.

Whereas the United States has been and remains highly dependent on space capabilities, China has historically been less dependent on them. This means that China has traditionally had far less to lose from striking satellites in orbit and comparatively more to gain from disabling an adversary’s satellites.

Since the 1990s, China has invested in technologies that can jam, disable or outright destroy another country’s satellites. This effort has been driven by a desire to counter what it sees as a key vulnerability of the U.S. military – its heavy reliance on space capabilities.

Yet much has changed since China’s first anti-satellite test in 2007.

China has gradually narrowed the gap with the United States in space capabilities and is now one of the most powerful spacefaring nations on Earth. As a result, China now has more at stake if it were to lose access to space.

Space debris is becoming a serious threat to Chinese interests in space. In 2022, for example, reports emerged that debris from Russia’s 2021 ASAT test came dangerously close to a Chinese satellite. Similarly, in 2021 China filed a claim at the United Nations that China’s Tiangong space station had to perform avoidance maneuvers due to “close encounters” with Starlink satellites. And now, in November 2025, China’s Shenzhou-20 spacecraft has actually been struck by space debris.

Recognizing the problem

It is too early to gauge how seriously Chinese officials view the threat of space debris. However, the high-profile nature of this recent incident may alert China’s public and officials to the risks posed by space debris.

China’s space station, its astronauts and its satellites are important to the Chinese Communist Party. If space debris permanently destroyed parts or all of China’s space station, or even killed a Chinese astronaut, it would likely lead to significant public outcry.

China’s space station is a project over three decades in the making and is the crown jewel of its space program. The Tiangong is set to become the only space station in orbit if the United States proceeds with its plans to deorbit the ISS in 2030.

A space station, which looks like several connected cylinders with solar panels coming off them, orbiting the planet Earth.
An illustration of China’s Tiangong space station. alejomiranda/iStock via Getty Images

Just as an owner of an expensive Lamborghini may become increasingly worried about dangerous road conditions that may damage their prized possession, Chinese officials may become anxious about China’s ability to operate its space station should space junk continue to clutter low Earth orbit.

Even if space debris does not damage China’s space station, it still poses a risk to Chinese satellites. And low Earth orbit is likely to become only more crowded, as SpaceX has announced plans to add up to 40,000 Starlink satellites in orbit, and China plans to add tens of thousands more satellites in low Earth orbit through its Guowang and Qianfan satellite megaconstellations.

China’s growing vulnerability to space debris creates an area of mutual concern where the United States and China may be able to work together to avoid future accidents.

Three astronauts walking down a street lined with crowds in stands waving Chinese flags.
China’s human spaceflight program is a point of national pride. Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images

Risk-reduction measures could include the two countries notifying each other about potential collisions. China and the United States could also open discussions around how to safely operate satellites or remove them from orbit when they’re no longer useful.

It remains to be seen what lessons Chinese decision-makers draw from this recent episode. But the problem of space debris is not going away.The Conversation

R. Lincoln Hines, Assistant Professor of International Affairs, Georgia Institute of Technology

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Multistate infant botulism outbreak results in baby formula recall; county health officials monitor situation

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 14 November 2025

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — A multistate infant botulism outbreak that’s been linked to a New York company has led to a nationwide product recall, while county health officials say no cases have been reported locally.

The Lake County Department Health Services said it is monitoring developments related to the outbreak that’s been linked to select lots of ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula. 

“At this time, all affected products have been removed from store shelves, and no cases have been reported locally,” the agency said in a Thursday statement.

The California Department of Public Health said 15 infants with suspected or confirmed infant botulism and confirmed exposure to Byheart Whole Nutrition infant formula have been reported in 12 states: Arizona, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Washington. Two cases each have been reported in California, Illinois and Texas.

As of Tuesday, 10 cases have been confirmed and five have testing underway, CDPH said.

On Nov. 8, ByHeart Inc. issued a voluntary recall of two lots of its Whole Nutrition Infant Formula: Lot 206VABP/251261P2 and Lot 206VABP/251131P2, both with use-by dates of Dec. 1, 2026.

ByHeart said the recalled formula was sold through ByHeart.com and major retailers nationwide, including Amazon, Kroger, Walmart, Whole Foods, Target and SamsClub.com.

Then, on Tuesday, ByHeart announced it is expanding its voluntary recall to include all batches of ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula cans and Anywhere Pack nationwide.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been investigating the infant botulism outbreak, which began over the summer.

The CDC said that, as of Tuesday — when the latest numbers were available — 84 infants nationwide have received treatment for infant botulism. 

Infants with botulism show symptoms including constipation, poor feeding, loss of head control and difficulty swallowing in the initial stages, according to the CDC. 

Without treatment, the CDC said the condition can advance to paralysis and breathing difficulties that require lengthy hospitalization and treatment with an intravenous medication called BabyBIG that’s used to treat infant botulism caused by botulinum toxin types A and B.

Among those babies receiving treatment, 36 had any powdered infant formula exposure and 15 consumed ByHeart Whole Nutrition infant formula. 

With ByHeart brand formula being “disproportionately represented among sick infants in this outbreak,” while at the same time only representing an estimated 1% of all infant formula sales in the United States, the recall resulted.

The illnesses were reported between Aug. 9 and Nov. 10, with all 15 of the specific cases connected to ByHeart requiring hospitalizations, the FDA said. Those babies ranged in age from two weeks to five months old.

Officials said there have been no deaths to date.

In a Tuesday statement, ByHeart said it was alerted by federal health officials on Nov. 7. The following day, it announced its first voluntary recall.

The company said it’s taking the action in close collaboration with the FDA, “despite the fact that no unopened ByHeart product has tested positive for Clostridium botulinum spores or toxin.”

Lake County Health Services said it will continue to monitor the situation closely and share updates as they become available.

“At this time, the outbreak does not pose any concerns regarding infant formula shortages for parents and caregivers,” the agency said.

Parents or caregivers with concerns about the recalled formula may visit the FDA or CDPH website or contact their healthcare provider for guidance.

ByHeart also is offering information and support for parents here.

The CDC estimates that one half of all infants under one year in the United States depend on infant formula.

Because of the large number of infants that require it and the small number of producers nationwide, a 2022 shortage hit the nation particularly hard. 

The shortage began late the previous year due to supply chain issues arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, which were exacerbated when Abbott Nutrition — a key baby formula manufacturer — pulled produce from the shelters and stopped production at a Michigan plant following an FDA investigation into foodborne illness, according to a paper published by the National Library of Medicine.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social. 

  1. Police seek missing teenager
  2. Clearlake Animal Control: ‘Delilah’ and the dogs
  3. The shutdown has ended – but this economist isn’t rejoicing quite yet
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page