How to resolve AdBlock issue? 
Business News
- Details
- Written by: California Controller’s Office
Total revenues of $19.91 billion for June were greater than anticipated in the budget signed in June 2017 by $2.30 billion or 13.1 percent. All of the “big three” revenue sources came in higher than projected.
Overall revenues for FY 2017-18 of $135.29 billion were $1.53 billion more than estimates in the May budget revision and $6.82 billion higher than expected in the 2017-18 Budget Act. Total fiscal year revenues were $13.38 billion higher than in FY 2016-17.
For June, personal income tax, or PIT, receipts of $12.57 billion were $691.8 million, or 5.8 percent, higher than estimated in the budget proposal released in May.
For the fiscal year, PIT receipts of $93.48 billion were $4.34 billion, or 4.9 percent, more than projected in the 2017-18 Budget Act.
June corporation taxes of $3.23 billion were $577.2 million, or 21.7 percent, above assumptions in the governor’s May budget proposal. For the fiscal year, total corporation tax receipts were 14.8 percent above assumptions in the enacted budget.
Sales tax receipts of $3.15 billion for June were $759.0 million, or 31.8 percent, more than anticipated in the governor’s FY 2018-19 amended budget proposal. For the fiscal year, sales tax receipts were 2.0 percent higher than expectations in the 2017-18 Budget Act.
At the conclusion of FY 2017-18, the state’s General Fund had $10.38 billion more in receipts than disbursements, and $4.84 billion were used to repay outstanding loans from the previous fiscal year.
At the end of June, there were $39.93 billion available for internal borrowing from the state’s own funds, which was more than anticipated in the May budget proposal by $1.81 billion.
- Details
- Written by: Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program
The group of 23 grantees of the Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program, or RMAP, endorsed the letter calling on Senators to fund the program in their competing farm bill proposal.
The letter asks for a $3 million appropriation in mandatory funding each year.
RMAP provides access to loan capital through grants to organizations that provide training, technical assistance, or small loans to rural businesses nationwide.
Since its creation in 2008, the program has helped 2,100 small businesses by creating jobs and expanding consumer access to goods and services in underserved areas.
The Senate passed its farm bill proposal on June 28, 2018, and failed to include funding for RMAP.
Organizations endorsing the letter span 15 states and are engaging Senators as they head to the Joint Conference Committee where a final deal will be reached with the House.
In the letter, supporters wrote, “A small investment in this program in the farm bill makes a big difference. RMAP... is a sound investment in the future of our rural communities.”
“Rural businesses play an important role in our nation’s economy, and it is critical that Congress supports RMAP with mandatory funding,” said Cora Fox, policy associate at the Center for Rural Affairs, which also endorsed the letter. “Without RMAP, countless small businesses will lose access to funds that make them economic anchors in tens of thousands of rural communities.”
Between 1995 and 2015, many rural banks closed, increasing the percentage of rural areas without a local bank from 12 percent to 32 percent and further restricting access to loans for many small businesses.
“RMAP helps spark innovation and economic activity in rural areas where it is sorely needed,” said Anna Johnson, senior policy associate at the Center for Rural Affairs. “Small scale entrepreneurship is a proven strategy to revitalize rural communities, and RMAP can help create genuine opportunity across rural America with modest public investment.”
Funding for RMAP is set to expire on Sept. 30, 2018, unless renewed in the farm bill.
Organizations signing the letter include Arkansas: Communities Unlimited, Inc., Fayetteville; California: California FarmLink, Santa Cruz; Feed the Hunger Foundation, San Francisco; Jefferson Economic Development Institute, Mount Shasta; Terra Green Community Development Corporation, Alameda; Colorado: Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation, Westminster; Idaho: Clearwater Economic Development Association, Lewiston; Kentucky: Community Ventures Corporation, Lexington; Maine: Community Concepts Finance Corporation, Lewiston; MaineStream Finance, Bangor; Northern Maine Development Commission, Caribou; Maryland: Eastern Shore Entrepreneurship Center, Easton; Massachusetts: Quaboag Valley Community Development Corporation, Ware; Michigan: Northern Initiatives, Marquette; Montana: MoFi, Missoula; Nebraska: Center for Rural Affairs, Lyons; First Ponca Financial, Grand Island; New Jersey: Cooperative Business Assistance Corporation, Camden; Oregon: Klamath Lake Regional Housing Center, Klamath Falls; Pennsylvania: Community First Fund, Lancaster; South Dakota: Glacial Lakes Area Development, Britton; Lakota Funds, Kyle; Washington: Seattle Economic Development Fund dba Business Impact NW, Seattle.
- Details
- Written by: Lake County News Reports
Specifically, SB 1038 clarifies that harassers may be held personally liable for taking retaliatory action against workers who assert their legal rights under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, or FEHA.
In current law, individuals may already be held personally liable for harassment claims under FEHA.
However, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership (2008) 42 Cal. 4th 1158 rendered the issue of whether individuals may be held personally liable for retaliation unclear.
By statutorily clarifying that harassers can also be held liable on a personal basis in cases of retaliation, SB 1038 will help ensure that individuals who retaliate against workers to silence or intimidate them will be held accountable.
“The continued focus on the #MeToo and #WeSaidEnough movements highlights the continued need for California to strengthen protections for victims of harassment from retaliation, since fear of retaliation is one of the biggest barriers to victims coming forward,” Sen. Leyva said. “SB 1038 will ensure that, if and when a person decides to exercise their legal rights against discrimination and harassment, he or she is not retaliated against for taking those admirable steps. I appreciate the Assembly Judiciary Committee’s support of this measure today so that we can make sure that victims are not silenced or otherwise intimidated.”
As the vice chair of the California Legislative Women’s Caucus, Senator Leyva authored legislation signed into law to eliminate the statute of limitations on rape (SB 813) in 2016 and to criminalize sextortion (SB 500) in 2017.
The Senator is also currently leading efforts to ban secret settlements in cases of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and sex discrimination in California (SB 820) and require law enforcement agencies and forensic laboratories to promptly test all newly collected rape kits in California (SB 1449).
Co-sponsored by Equal Rights Advocates and California Employment Lawyers Association, SB 1038 is supported by the California Women’s Law Center, Child Care Law Center, Church State Council, Citizens for Choice – Nevada County, Coalition of Labor Union Women – California Chapter, Consumer Attorneys of California, Legal Aid at Work, National Council of Jewish Women – California Chapter, Public Counsel, Tradeswomen, Inc., Women Lawyers of Sacramento and Women’s Foundation of California.
- Details
- Written by: California Department of Food and Agriculture
The board advises the Secretary on the department’s Fertilizing Materials Inspection Program, which ensures fertilizing materials are safe, effective, and meet quality guarantees.
As part of the Fertilizing Materials Inspection Program, inspectors and investigators located throughout the state conduct routine sampling and inspections; respond to consumer complaints; and enforce laws and regulations that govern the manufacturing and distribution of fertilizing materials.
The program is funded by fertilizer license fees and assessments.
The term of office for board members is three years. Members receive no compensation, but are entitled to necessary travel expenses. Applicants must hold a current fertilizing materials license or be a representative of a licensed firm.
Individuals interested in a board appointment must submit a resume and a completed Prospective Member Appointment Questionnaire (PMAQ), available on the CDFA Web site at www.cdfa.ca.gov/is/ffldrs by Aug. 31.
Send resume and PMAQ via email to
For more information, contact Brittnie Sabalbro at 916-900-5022 or