How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login

News

Tickets still available for May 22 Lake Leadership Forum

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — Hospitality, health care and workforce will be the topics featured during the fifth Lake Leadership Forum to be held on Wednesday, May 22, at On The Waterfront, 60 Third Street, Lakeport.

The program begins at 1 p.m. and concludes with a walking tour of Xabatin Community Park at 4:30 p.m.

Presented by the Lake County Economic Development Corp., or Lake EDC, along with the Lake County Chamber of Commerce and the Lake County Tourism Improvement District, the Lake Leadership Forum is open to the public with a limited number of tickets available at tinyurl.com/LakeLeader2024.

A limited number of tickets are on sale for $30 per person which includes tapas and a glass of wine or other beverage.

Tickets may also be purchased with a check payable to and sent to Lake EDC, P.O. Box 1257, Lakeport, CA 95453.

Sutter Lakeside Hospital is the presenting sponsor. The event is also generously supported by Calpine, Lake County Tribal Health, Reynolds Systems, Adventist Health Clear Lake, the City of Lakeport, Community First Credit Union, and Savings Bank of Mendocino County.

The event’s keynote speaker is Caroline Beteta, president and CEO of Visit California.

Beteta will share the current state of the tourism industry for the state and her insight on the future of hospitality and rural markets.

Additionally, Clair Whitmer, deputy director for the California Office of the Small Business Advocate, will discuss the state’s efforts to support businesses.

A panel discussion regarding workforce development and attraction in Lake County will include Jonathan Walters, manager of Brassfield Winery; Brock Falkenberg, Lake County superintendent of schools; Greg Panella, co-owner of Stokes Ladders and Panella Orchards; and Jennifer Delgadillo Bevington, co-director of the Redwood Region K16 Educational Collaborative.

Speakers will demonstrate the collaborative spirit of Lake County through presentations by Tonya Hat, proprietor of THAT Ranch; Christian Ahlmann of Six Sigma Ranch & Winery; Annie Tyner, director of Jack’s Lavender Farm; and Akriti Wong, director of Citizens Caring 4 Clear Lake.

The presenting organizations represent people from all over Lake County who love our community and want to see it prosper.

You are invited to participate in this leadership forum and connect with like-minded citizens.

More information is available from Nicole Flora, executive director, Lake EDC, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Middletown Area Town Hall to meet May 9

MIDDLETOWN, Calif. — The Middletown Area Town Hall, or MATH, will discuss the latest on key community projects when it meets this week.

MATH will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, May 9, in the Middletown Community Meeting Room/Library at 21256 Washington St., Middletown. The meeting is open to the public.

To join the meeting via Zoom click on this link; the meeting ID is 869-1824-5695, pass code is 808449. Call in at 669-900-6833.

On the agenda are updates on a major use permit for a 19.6-acre commercial cannabis grow proposed by former Supervisor Jim Comstock under the “Rancho Lake Inc.” name. That project is set to be heard Thursday morning by the Lake County Planning Commission.

The group also will discuss the Pacific Gas and Electric geothermal waste landfill and the Middletown Area Plan update.

MATH’s next meeting will take place on June 13.

MATH — established by resolution of the Lake County Board of Supervisors on Dec. 12, 2006 — is a municipal advisory council serving the residents of Anderson Springs, Cobb, Coyote Valley (including Hidden Valley Lake), Long Valley and Middletown.

For more information email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.

Boomers have a drug problem, but not the kind you might think

 

Some boomers are on multiple medications. Combinations of those drugs could have serious side effects. Getty Images / Sporrer/Rupp

Baby boomers – that’s anyone born in the U.S. between 1946 and 1964 – are 20% of the population, more than 70 million Americans. Decades ago, many in that generation experimented with drugs that were both recreational and illegal. Although boomers may not be using those same drugs today, many are taking medications, often several of them. And even if those drugs are legal, there are still risks of interactions and side effects.

The taking of multiple medications is called polypharmacy, typically four or more at the same time. That includes prescriptions from doctors, over-the-counter medicines, supplements and herbs. Sometimes, polypharmacy can be dangerous.

I am a geriatrician, one of only 7,500 in the U.S. That’s not nearly enough to accommodate the surging number of elderly boomers who will need medical care over the next two to three decades – or help in dealing with the potential problems of multiple drug use.

Make sure your doctor is regularly reviewing your medication list. Getty Images / dszc

Reactions to medications can change over time

We geriatricians know that polypharmacy isn’t always bad; multiple medications may be necessary. If you’ve had a heart attack, you might be on four medications or more – beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, statins and aspirin, for instance. And that’s appropriate.

But about half of older adults take at least one medication that’s not necessary or no longer needed. Doctors need to periodically reevaluate to make sure each medication is still right for the patient and still the correct dose. During treatment, the patient’s weight may fluctuate, either up or down. Even if it stays the same, body composition might change; that occurs as people age. As a result, one may react differently to a drug. That can happen even with a medication a person has been on for years.

Polypharmacy often means higher health care costs and more drug interactions. Patients are more likely to miss medications or stop taking them altogether. Sometimes, physical activity diminshes; falls, cognitive impairment, malnourishment and urinary incontinence increase; there may be less ability to do daily tasks. Those on five or more medications have a much higher incidence of having an ADE – an adverse drug event – compared to those using fewer meds. Making matters worse, the symptoms of polypharmacy are sometimes masked and taken as signs of aging.

Check the list

Studies have suggested solutions, with better coordination among care providers being one. Making the pharmacist an integral part of routine care is another. The increasing use of electronic patient records helps. So do smartphone apps, sometimes an easier way for patients and providers to connect. But so far, there’s no magic pill, and as researchers and clinicians investigate improvements, much of the burden remains on patients and their families.

There are steps you can take to stay safe, however. Regularly clean out the medicine cabinet and get rid of expired medicines or those you’re no longer taking. Either throw them away or ask your doctor or pharmacist about the best way to dispose of them. When seeing the doctor, bring in the meds you take and review each one in detail. Make certain you need to continue taking them all and verify the right dose.

Make sure you regularly check the expiration dates on your medications. Getty Images / dszc

You can also check the PIMs list, also known as the Beer’s List. Published by the American Geriatric Society, it’s an index of medications potentially harmful to the elderly. Some are linked to increased risks of side effects, and not a few are sold over-the-counter without prescription.

That includes medicines containing antihistamines like diphenhydramine, or Benadryl. In the elderly population, Benadryl carries an increased risk of dizziness, confusion and urinary retention. Medicines that are part of the NSAID family (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) are also on the list. In some elderly patients, they can cause high blood pressure or kidney failure. Commonly used medicines in the NSAID family are those containing ibuprofen or naproxen.

Just because a medicine is on the Beer’s List doesn’t mean your doctor was wrong to prescribe it, or that you should stop using it. Instead, use the medication with caution and discuss with your doctor to make sure you need it. Determine with your doctor the lowest useful dose, monitor for side effects, and speak up if you have any.

As a geriatrician, I see patients in an outpatient setting, either as their primary care provider or as a specialist consultant. We review medications at every visit: the list, the dose and how often the patient is taking it. A true and accurate medication list is the critical first step in geriatric care.

This is especially important during care transitions, such as when a patient is coming out of the hospital or nursing home. Particularly at that time, we find out if the patient is using the medication as prescribed, or taking it more frequently or less or not at all. Which leads to my final piece of advice: If you’ve strayed with your meds, one way or another, know that we doctors don’t judge or punish patients. Just tell us the truth. That’s all we want to hear. Then we can move forward together to find the best regimen for you.The Conversation

Laurie Archbald-Pannone, Associate Professor of Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Virginia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Kelseyville Unified hears from community about land acknowledgement, Indigenous peoples resolution

UPDATE* This video has been updated due to a transcoding error. 



KELSEYVILLE, Calif. — At the end of a nearly three-hour special meeting on Tuesday night, the Kelseyville Unified School District Board of Trustees came to a compromise decision regarding a proposed resolution that addressed healing and reconciliation with Lake County’s tribes.

The resolution has drawn pushback due to concerns from some community members that it appeared to support an effort now underway to change Kelseyville’s name.

That continuing community concern — despite the district’s efforts to clear up what it said has been misinformation about the board’s intentions — was in evidence on Tuesday night in the large crowd that sat through the lengthy meeting.

Those concerns were countered by Indigenous community members who turned out in large numbers and spoke to their desire to be seen, acknowledged and included.

But in the end, the school board chose not to move ahead with the resolution for the time being.

“The resolution that is causing so much fear and divisiveness will not be discussed in the near future,” said Board President Rick Winer before he made the motion to table the resolution, which was seconded by Trustee Mary Beth Mosko, who then joked that she wanted to make a resolution that the board not pass any more resolutions.

The board voted unanimously to table the resolution. However, one of the document’s key goals, to establish a land acknowledgement at major school events such as graduation, will go forward, a decision that responded to concerns of Indigenous speakers that they be recognized.

The trustees decided to split out the land acknowledgement and have the senior class and seniors in the high school’s Native American Club sit down with the high school principal and decide on language that the students would approve of for their ceremony.

That suggestion came in response to a report from senior class leadership that an anonymous survey of graduating seniors found that 60% of the 114 seniors were against doing the acknowledgement.

The resolution originally was on the regular April 23 board agenda, but after close to 130 people showed up to the meeting, held in the boardroom with occupancy of 35 people, it was decided to schedule a special meeting at the urging of retired county supervisor, Rob Brown.

Tuesday’s night’s meeting was held at the Tom Aiken Student Center at Kelseyville High School, which had room for the audience that continued to grow during the evening to an estimated size of more than 150 people. Throughout the crowd there were numerous people wearing orange shirts or vests to signify their support for Kelseyville.

Criticism and division

The board has weathered a month and a half of feedback — some of it critical and accusatory — about the proposed resolution, which arose at the same time as a proposal to change the name of the town to “Konocti” is being considered by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names.

The resolution and name change have become so conflated that Winer said board members were getting emails from people imploring them not to change the town’s name, which isn’t a power they have, he said.

To address those concerns, at the start of the meeting, Board Clerk Gilbert Rangel, who wrote the resolution, spoke for more than a half hour about what his intentions had been, as well as what the resolution is meant to do — and not meant to do.

Rangel said the resolution was not meant to be aligned with either of the two opposing groups who are involved in the name change matter. However, he said that after speaking with community members in recent weeks, he could understand how people had come to believe that.

The original draft resolution that Rangel had submitted to the board on March 19 had language that he said could be misinterpreted to suggest that it could have been biased.

That language, in particular, had stated that “this district will not be able to fully and truly honor the citizens of these nations and their ancestors who lived here for generations for as long as it bears a name that for those citizens and their ancestors represent a painful past.” That language was removed in an updated version.

Rangel said the resolution needed to be truthful, and that Native Americans have suffered, not just in Kelseyville but across the nation, and continue to suffer from intergenerational trauma.

He showed examples of land acknowledgements from other school districts and organizations to illustrate that the statements are becoming more common and accepted.

“We are inviting the community to join us in this effort,” he said.

Opponents say resolution is political

A recurring theme in comments made throughout the meeting by those opposed to the resolution was the suggestion that the matter was a political one and that, as a result, the school board shouldn’t be involved with deciding it.

Business leader Mark Borghesani, a member of the Save Kelseyville group, said that the resolution made the board appear to be aligned with the name change proponents Citizens for Healing, who Borghesani said have called anyone who doesn’t agree with them racists. He asked for the board to table the resolution until after a decision is made on the town’s name.

The discussion frequently veered into the wrongs — including rape, murder and enslavement — perpetrated against Lake County tribes by Andrew Kelsey. Kelsey, along with Charles Stone, was murdered by tribal members in December 1849, which led to the Bloody Island Massacre in May of 1850.

A short time after Borghesani spoke, Alan Fletcher, a Citizens for Healing member, said he didn’t know why anyone would want to memorialize someone who raped children before he accused name change opponents of being part of a “commercial operation” to protect the town’s brand.

He then suggested even the proposed name of “Konocti” for the town is too specific and suggested instead that Big Valley would be better. Fletcher was successful in March in convincing the Board of Supervisors to name the new Kelseyville advisory council the Big Valley Advisory Council instead.

Tribal members ask for inclusion

Members of several tribes from around Lake County spoke throughout the evening, urging the school board to accept the resolution as an acknowledgement of past injustices and a way of shaping the future.

Dannette Rangel of Big Valley said she has eight children, seven of them students from kindergarten to high school, in the district’s schools. The eighth graduated last year and wore native regalia to the ceremony.

She said the land acknowledgment is a huge step in the right direction. “I don’t have hate in my heart for the history of the past,” she said, but added that she wanted a simple acknowledgement.

Flaman McCloud, tribal chair of Big Valley Band of Pomo, said he grew up in the city and when he came to Lake County he encountered a situation where he sees everyday what his people go through due to their history.

“You can’t say that it is over because we still live it,” he said.

McCloud said they still feel feet are on their necks, no matter how much economic development they do.

Now, they are asking for acknowledgement, to be told, “We see you,” he said, adding, “That’s all we are asking.”

He said those who oppose the acknowledgement are afraid of losing, but McCloud said they are not coming to take anything; they just want to be recognized and part of the community.

Third generation Kelseyville resident Sheli Wright said she wanted to remind the board of its purpose — to ensure that the schools are doing their job.

Wright said this fight right now is not good. “It is causing political strife, whether we like it or not.”

Katie Ray, a member of the Round Valley tribe which was forcibly removed from the Chico area, spoke accompanied by members of the high school’s Native American Club, who painted the school’s new mural. Ray said they did it for healing and to bring people together.

“If not now, when?” Ray asked, which was in response to previous speakers asking to put the resolution off.

Ray questioned when natives would be included in the community. “In order to have healing, we need to be included.”

Mark Conrad, a teacher and coach of more than 30 years, said he was “a little insulted” to hear of accusations by tribal members of unfair treatment in the schools.

He said everyone was treated the same, with the goal of making students into responsible adults.

Clayton Duncan, a member of Robinson Rancheria, recounted his grandmother Lucy Moore’s escape from soldiers as a small child during the Bloody Island Massacre.

He said he’s tired of being invisible in his own land. “I’m not invisible. I’m a human being,” he said, adding they were only asking for recognition.

Grace Martinez, a Big Valley Pomo, and her family stood at the podium and she explained that her children are proud to go to Kelseyville schools.

Martinez said she’s proud to be Native American. “I come here today to say, acknowledge us. That’s all I'm asking.”

Board consider testimony

After the public testimony drew to a close, the board members considered what they had heard.

Winer said a group of kids were asking to be recognized. “I think that is extremely, extremely important, and we need to get there.”

He said people worried about the name change are concerned that action the board takes will show favoritism about name change.

Winer said the community is right to fear the Board on Geographic Names. “Who knows who these people are.”

He added, “Come back to this room in July when they come here for a town hall to get your input.”

So far, the Board on Geographic Names hasn’t publicized its plans for such a meeting.

Due to the level of fear and divisiveness, Winer said he felt the matter should wait.

Board member Casey Carlson, who supported recognizing tribal members, said she understands concerns about people getting mixed up about the name change situation. She suggested that the district should write a formal letter to the Board on Geographic Names stating its neutral position.

Mosko, who noted she appreciated the Native American Club for doing the mural, said a resolution by the school board means nothing and that the timing of it also struck her as political. She didn’t think the school board needed to weigh in.

She said all students need to be acknowledged, and so she made the recommendation that the senior class — who didn’t have an eighth grade graduation due to COVID — should sit down to discuss a land acknowledgment.

Superintendent Nicki Thomas said that if the board wanted to move forward, they could have Kelseyville High Principal Mike Jones work with the Native American Club on a land acknowledgement.

Board member Tamah McQueen said she wanted the senior class to be involved along with the Native American Club.

In response to comments made during the meeting about educating young people about local tribal history, Superintendent Thomas said an ethnic studies course will be taught at the high school as a result of new legislation.

After Thomas told the board they needed to make a motion to table the resolution or approve it, Winer offered the motion, Mosko seconded and the unanimous vote was taken. Winer adjourned the meeting immediately after the vote.

Editor’s note: The article has been updated to show that Alan Fletcher said the name “Konocti” is too specific, not too broad.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, or Lake County News, @LakeCoNews.

May is Calfresh Awareness Month

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — May is “CalFresh Awareness Month,” a month of public outreach to increase awareness and enrollment in the CalFresh program.

CalFresh, known federally as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, provides monthly food benefits to individuals and families with low-income and provides economic benefits to communities.

EBT is the automated system that allows CalFresh recipients to use a card, much like a debit card, to access their food benefits for purchases at grocers.

There are 17,169 individuals in Lake County currently receiving CalFresh benefits totaling $3.08 million per month, $32.73 million in benefits over the course of the last year.

Every $1 in CalFresh generates $1.79 in local economic activity.

Many individuals and families who need food are unaware that they may qualify for assistance.

For instance, a family of four earning up to $4,626 gross per month may qualify for up to $939 in CalFresh benefits each month.

Spending benefits locally helps our local economy. Through the Market Match program, you can double your CalFresh spending power at our local farmers markets, that’s like shopping for 50% off at farmers markets.

See the farmers market host for additional details, or visit www.marketmatch.org.

The application process is confidential. Your county has 30 days to decide if you are eligible. Households with very low income and resources may get benefits within three days.

Get help putting healthy, nutritious food on the table. Go to www.benefitscal.com to apply now, or call 707-995-4200 (TTY 711) Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. for information on other ways to apply.

Lung cancer is the deadliest of all cancers, and screening could save many lives − if more people could access it

 

Lung cancer screening can save lives, but it isn’t accessible to everyone at risk of developing the disease. sudok1/iStock via Getty Images Plus

Many medical organizations have been recommending lung cancer screening for decades for those at high risk of developing the disease.

But in 2022, less than 6% of people in the U.S. eligible for screening actually got screened. Compared with other common cancer screenings, lung cancer screening rates fall terribly behind. For comparison, the screening rate in 2021 for colon cancer was 72%, and the rate for breast cancer was 76%. Why are lung cancer screening rates so poor?

I am a pulmonologist who specializes in screening and diagnosing lung cancer. In my research to improve early detection of lung cancer, I’ve found that numerous complex barriers hinder the widespread adoption of lung cancer screening.

Basics of lung cancer screening

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. But early detection can significantly improve outcomes.

Survival rates for early stage lung cancer are nearly seven times higher than lung cancer that has spread in the body. Between 2015 and 2019, survival rates for lung cancer have improved by 22%, in part because of an increase in earlier diagnosis.

Most patients with early-stage lung cancer, however, have no symptoms and aren’t diagnosed until they reach more advanced stages that are harder to treat, underlining the need for effective lung cancer screening.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends lung cancer screening for people 50-80 years old, people who currently smoke or previously smoked but quit within the past 15 years, and people who smoked at least 20 pack-years. Pack-years is an estimate of cigarette exposure in a person’s lifetime, calculated by multiplying the total number of years someone has smoked by the average number of packs smoked per day. For example, if someone smoked half a pack per day for 40 years, they would have smoked for 20 pack-years.

Low-dose CT scan for lung cancer

One of the primary barriers to lung cancer screening is lack of public awareness and understanding. Many people are unaware they qualify for lung cancer screening or have misconceptions around what to expect from the screening process.

Lung cancer screening involves a yearly low-dose computed tomography, or CT, scan, a diagnostic imaging tool that uses X-rays to create detailed cross sections of the inside of the body. Screening 250 patients can prevent one lung cancer death. In comparison, 645 people screened with a mammogram can prevent one breast cancer death.

Some people have reservations surrounding the scan itself because of radiation exposure. The radiation from a low-dose CT scan, however, is about 1.4 millisieverts – the scientific unit used to measure ionizing radiation – which is less than the 3 to 5 millisieverts of background radiation a person may be exposed to in a given year on average while living on Earth.

Patient lying in CT machine while radiologist looks on
Lung cancer screening typically involves a low-dose CT scan. Johnny Greig/E+ via Getty Images

The whole process takes only a few minutes and does not require any needles, medications or infusions. During the scan, the patient lies on the scanner’s sliding table and raises their arms above their head. The technologist may ask them to hold their breath for 5 to 10 seconds as the table passes through the scanner.

A radiologist summarizes the results of the test for their doctor in a report. If the result is negative for findings in the lungs, the patient would return in one year for another scan. If the result is positive, it usually means the radiologist saw a lung nodule, or a spot on the lung. Not all lung nodules are cancer, and patients may require additional imaging or a biopsy to confirm.

Disparities in lung cancer screening

Public health campaigns and education initiatives work to engage the public and increase awareness of the availability and benefit of lung cancer screening. However, these efforts have been less effective in some of the communities most at risk for developing lung cancer.

African American men have the highest rates of developing and dying from lung cancer compared with other groups, even at younger ages and among those with less smoking history. The tobacco industry has explicitly targeted the Black community with pervasive marketing tactics in predominantly Black neighborhoods and stores. Since the 1970s, the tobacco industry has aggressively marketed menthol cigarettes to African Americans using tailored messaging and imagery. This compounds and exacerbates the socioeconomic disparities in health care and cancer care already seen in these underserved and underrepresented communities.

Health advocates have called for a ban on menthol cigarettes in the U.S.

Rural communities face geographic barriers to lung cancer screening. About 80.5 million Americans live in counties with high rates of lung cancer and poor access to a quality screening center. Many of these counties are clustered in the Appalachian and southeastern regions of the U.S. where smoking rates are highest. Over 60% of people living in rural areas who are eligible for lung cancer screening have to travel over 20 miles to a screening facility.

Lung cancer screening may also be costly. While most private insurances and Medicare cover the cost of lung cancer screening, Medicaid policies vary state by state and may not cover the cost of lung cancer screening. In addition, while some plans may cover the initial low-dose CT scan, they might not cover follow-up testing, procedures and treatment. Supplementary costs such as transportation, time off from work, child care and other logistical issues can also add up to create additional socioeconomic barriers to screening.

Communities that are under- or uninsured are at the highest risk of developing lung cancer. They often lack access to primary care providers, let alone specialists who can facilitate screening.

Erasing smoking stigma

Because lung cancer is linked to smoking, stigma plays a significant role in preventing many people eligible for screening from pursuing it. Many people eligible for lung cancer screening fear being blamed for their previous or current tobacco use.

Stigma also discourages patients from discussing lung cancer screening with their health care providers or community. Clinicians can partner with patients and communities to destigmatize lung cancer and tobacco dependence, extricating the disease from blame. Framing screening as a proactive measure to help those at risk of developing lung cancer and as a collaboration with those who need help quitting smoking can empower people to actively engage in screening rather than dreading or avoiding it.

Fear is another barrier. Many people believe that a lung cancer diagnosis is a death sentence. When diagnosed early, however, doctors treat lung cancer with an intention to cure. Additionally, advances in lung cancer treatment over the past 10-15 years have led to remarkable improvements in survival for all stages of the disease. Reassurance and education around next steps and paths to treatment at the time of screening help diffuse some of the distress surrounding lung cancer.

Public health researchers are exploring how to minimize the significant and complex barriers to lung cancer screening for those who need it most.The Conversation

Nina Thomas, Assistant Professor of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

  • 457
  • 458
  • 459
  • 460
  • 461
  • 462
  • 463
  • 464
  • 465
  • 466

Community

  • Lake County Wine Alliance offers sponsor update; beneficiary applications open 

  • Mendocino National Forest announces seasonal hiring for upcoming field season

Public Safety

  • Lakeport Police logs: Thursday, Jan. 15

  • Lakeport Police logs: Wednesday, Jan. 14

Education

  • Woodland Community College receives maximum eight-year reaffirmation of accreditation from ACCJC

  • SNHU announces Fall 2025 President's List

Health

  • California ranks 24th in America’s Health Rankings Annual Report from United Health Foundation

  • Healthy blood donors especially vital during active flu season

Business

  • Two Lake County Mediacom employees earn company’s top service awards

  • Redwood Credit Union launches holiday gift and porch-to-pantry food drives

Obituaries

  • Rufino ‘Ray’ Pato

  • Patty Lee Smith

Opinion & Letters

  • The benefits of music for students

  • How to ease the burden of high electric bills

Veterans

  • CalVet and CSU Long Beach team up to improve data collection related to veteran suicides

  • A ‘Big Step Forward’ for Gulf War Veterans

Recreation

  • Wet weather trail closure in effect on Upper Lake Ranger District

  • Mendocino National Forest seeking public input on OHV grant applications

  • State Parks announces 2026 Anderson Marsh nature walk schedule 

  • BLM lifts seasonal fire restrictions in central California

Religion

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian to host Ash Wednesday service and Lenten dinner Feb. 18

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian Church to hold ‘Longest Night’ service Dec. 21

Arts & Life

  • Auditions announced for original musical ‘Even In Shadow’ set for March 21 and 28

  • ‘The Rip’ action heist; ‘Steal’ grounded in a crime thriller

Government & Politics

  • Lake County Democrats issue endorsements in local races for the June California Primary

  • County negotiates money-saving power purchase agreement

Legals

  • March 3 hearing on ordinance amending code for commercial cannabis uses

  • Feb. 12 public hearing on resolution to establish standards for agricultural roads

How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page