Letters
- Details
- Written by: Dave Gebhard
The cliché: if they took our guns away, only criminals would have guns is too horrible. It would be unbearable to be defenseless against criminals who obviously would never surrender their arms.
It is not as if we were unarmed to start with, there are millions of arms in the general public now. Most gun owners would concur with and support increased background checks, we already have them in California, but we are all scared of the pacifists outlawing our guns and making us all criminals.
Another cliché comes to mind, that that they would have to take my gun from my cold dead hands.
Our police are not bodyguards, they investigate crime and bring criminals to justice, it is our own responsibility to defend ourselves within the limits of the law.
Let’s not forget who creates these horrendous acts, people not firearms. Before guns, swords, bows, knives, and spears killed millions, and an unarmed and untrained populace made it easy for the bad guys.
I would rather think of people as being mostly of good will, and trusting that we outnumber and outgun the bad guys.
So let’s not get carried away with emotion, we all sympathize and even empathize with the victims’ families and loved ones, but we must not get stampeded into making serious errors.
Remember what the law did with prohibition and our present drug war, they created an outlaw industry that nurtures and makes an entire new set of wealthy law breakers.
This would be a negative unintended consequence that none of us needs.
Dave Gebhard lives in Lakeport, Calif.
- Details
- Written by: James Hankins
Has any one actually read the Second Amendment?
It is quite simply worded, “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”
This has nothing to do with collecting guns, using gun for personal protection, nor hunting.
It seems to me the founding fathers were saying a militia (an army composed of ordinary citizens rather than professional soldiers) is needed to insure a free state.
That we the citizens of this country will be well armed and able to maintain our own freedoms. That we will not be subservient to a government that no longer places its citizens first. One where the politicians place their personal gains ahead of the country's well being.
While these mass murders in the news are horrible they are committed by an extremely small percentage of the citizens, yet our government would have us believe that they must disarm us all to make us safe.
Just look at what happens when unarmed citizens become unable to defend themselves from tyranny;
the history books are full of these tales and this is the very thing the founding fathers were trying to protect us from!
James Hankins lives in Lucerne, Calif.
- Details
- Written by: Randy Ridgel
Recently the news told of a man on the phone shouting to his wife, “Shoot him,” as an intruder broke into the crawl space where she was hiding with her children.
She did, and probably saved their lives. That reminded me of a personal horror story.
I attended Officer Candidate School (OCS) in Newport, Rhode Island, in July 1963. Despite a warning about the housing problem in Newport I took Jackie and two small sons there.
After a desperate search I was about to send them back to California when we found a place on the isthmus between Newport and Fall River, Massachusetts. It resembled the house in the movie “Psycho” and was isolated because a hurricane had destroyed the homes around it.
However, I wasn’t too worried because the elderly couple who rented it to us lived on the floor above. Below was a spooky basement where they stored antiques for their shop in Boston.
On reporting to OCS I learned two dreadful things: I couldn’t leave the base for six weeks and no phone calls were allowed.
At night I broke the law; the pay phone cord was long enough to reach into the head (restroom to you landlubbers) so I called Jackie and learned two more horrible things: First, the owners had moved out leaving her isolated and, second, Jackie spent most of the night driving around Newport because she was terrified to stay in that remote house alone with the children. Meanwhile I was confined to OCS.
During one nightly phone call she said, “Just a minute; I hear a noise downstairs.” I spent the longest minutes of my life shouting, “Hang up, Jackie; call the police.” I craved a gun for her and training to use it. Then she returned and said, “I guess it was the wind.” On my first liberty I found another house for them.
As you might guess from this, I’m against any gun control that would confiscate a gun from that lady in the crawl space and leave her at the mercy of the intruder. Do we really think someone willing to invade her house all the way to a crawl space where she’s hiding with her children cares about gun control?
Food for thought: Never in history, until recently, have young men engaged in mass murder with any weapons, including guns. Shouldn’t Washington wonder why – instead of fooling around with ignorant gun control laws that have proven not to work with criminals?
Randy Ridgel lives in Kelseyville, Calif.
- Details
- Written by: David Smith
For those who read this, I would like to draw up any support from this for Lake County News.
I have known about and worked with Elizabeth Larson for a number of years now. I was recently struck in awe when I read about the removal of Lake County News from the sheriff’s email list (“Lake County News sues sheriff for discrimination, retaliation over news coverage,” http://bit.ly/11eWnsi ).
This blatant disregard for their First Amendment rights just brings me back to thinking that this county has a serious “good ole’ boy” problem.
Lake County News has proven to be the best, honest, unbiased and the fairest of reporting that this County has and probably ever will see.
Another source of media is a local newspaper (which shall remain unnamed in this letter) that I’ve seen, which has shown bias in many ways, especially when local politics are called into question. I have seen this other media outlet deliberately leave information out, just to keep our community in the dark, which also includes a program called In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS).
I was deeply involved with supporting the IHSS program and know that I tried to get support from that other news source by reaching out to them and Lake County News.
Myself and other providers and clients would write letters to these outlets, with Lake County News being the only media outlet that would print anything that we wrote.
I am offering up any support that I can give to Lake County News and am asking many of the residents of this county to do the same.
Lake County News needs our support and many people should speak up about the latest infringement of their inalienable First Amendment rights, because if we lose their forthright and honest reporting, we might as well send ourselves into the dark ages.
David Smith lives in Nice, Calif.
How to resolve AdBlock issue?